We all realise that creationists must shun so many basic priciples of mainstream science in order to defend their beliefs, but this question deal with timescales and dating methods.
We are aware of the usual attacks on C-14 dating methods, and of the missrepresentations creationists make about it, but there are many other independant dating techniques, all of which corroborate and cross refence each other..
Creationists are aware of mainstream scientific chrononlogical timescales, even if they deny their validity, however these many dating methods are the cornerstone of mainstream scientific timescales, from hours ago, to billions of years ago.
The question for creationists is, would you please name any of the many OTHER dating techniques, and outline where it is flawed, in your opinion..?
Presumably you must know all about them to know they are flawed..?
2007-07-08
17:47:56
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Commonancestor
2