except when science disproves their theory of spontaneous life and evolution. Is reason, logic, and scientific evidence their kryptonite? Why do atheists/evolutionists act like academic scholars when they are discussing their views with an average person, then crumble like a deck of cards when someone has the guts to challenge them and point out the many flaws in their argument? Does Dawkins not discuss what to do when severely overmatched in a theological/scientific debate? Is this fear of losing a debate why atheists/evolutionists resort to insults and threats of violence instead of debates? Is this why they become immature children and start talking about spaghetti monsters? Perhaps if I was as closed-minded to science as atheists are, and if I showed blind-faith in pseudo-scientific theories and if I intimidated anyone that disagreed with me by calling them idiots, then maybe I would be an atheist too. But, that would make me just another sheep in the flock, wouldn't it?
2007-02-27
05:00:21
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Matt
4