Religion & Spirituality - 5 February 2007

2007-02-05 07:31:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-05 07:30:25 · 28 answers · asked by Sean 5

christians need to drop the whole "taking out of context" argument? its obvious they dont even bother opening their bible to read the surrounding text when they use this argument. i think its about time they come up with a new way to "beat around the bush" and avoid a potential debate with another meaningless statement.

2007-02-05 07:30:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since they had no way of knowing about Christianity... were they saved or damned?

2007-02-05 07:29:03 · 2 answers · asked by Zindo 1

2007-02-05 07:28:58 · 21 answers · asked by o 2

I believe that the person is somewhere in the old testament.

2007-02-05 07:28:35 · 6 answers · asked by PeT 1

I'd call that not-so-intelligent design.

2007-02-05 07:28:27 · 5 answers · asked by DBA GODZY 3

2007-02-05 07:27:06 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are you confident in your life and abilities, therefore, you don't need a "god" to help you?

Or do you humble yourself and acknowledge that you need God's forgiveness and help in life?

why?

2007-02-05 07:25:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are two arguments about religions. The first is that either all religions are false or only one is right. The other is that all religions are different explanations of the same phenomena. What do you be think describes reality?

2007-02-05 07:24:55 · 18 answers · asked by Brofo 3

to their church or denomination?

2007-02-05 07:23:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-05 07:23:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-05 07:23:23 · 27 answers · asked by codyboy 1

2007-02-05 07:22:43 · 17 answers · asked by azaria319 2

Everybody says something and can even make a mouvement with his words.The mouvement becomes a social aspect.Do you obey to any ideea , or do you obey only to God?Because He said one cannot obey two masters.

2007-02-05 07:21:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

While it certainly would take a long time... Hypothetically, if the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches came to some sort of way to amicably exist as a SINGLE Church, should they do it?

2007-02-05 07:21:47 · 15 answers · asked by Zindo 1

2007-02-05 07:21:34 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Did people speak in tongues at your church?
Were there people prophecying?
Did people get saved at your church?

2007-02-05 07:20:50 · 14 answers · asked by Doug 5

The definition of an agnostic is someone who claims that they don't have sufficient knowledge to KNOW weather there is a god or not.

Theists usually agree that there is no way to prove, or disprove the existence of god.

If this is true then nobody has sufficient knowledge as to weather god exists and is therefore an agnostic.

Any thoughts?

2007-02-05 07:20:22 · 15 answers · asked by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6

Is there like a soul quota you have to reach in order to get servant of the month?

If not what does it matter to you?

2007-02-05 07:19:23 · 17 answers · asked by bc_munkee 5

2007-02-05 07:19:23 · 7 answers · asked by Sean 5

2007-02-05 07:19:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

we have millions of interconnecting things that keep us alive, and who (please don't answer god- i'm not sure if I believe in him) created us? It can't be evolution, because then who came up with the idea of evolution? I can't have just come into existence without some sort of logical thought.

2007-02-05 07:16:48 · 28 answers · asked by Josie B 1

TEN BIG MACS!

2007-02-05 07:15:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-05 07:14:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

how come if anyone takes a verse from the bible you tell them its "out of context" or that they are doing it only to create an argument or this or that.

do you not know you do the very same? John 3:16, Romans 6:23
and many others, you take a SINGLE verse from the bible to mean something. why can these verses be singled out and mean something, and other verses cant?

2007-02-05 07:11:51 · 41 answers · asked by Anonymous

This was explained in Church but I still do not understand the scripture. I need some help with this scripture. When I read the scripture I got a different meaning than what was explained in Church.

Other wise what was explained in Church was that the congreation is suppose to do more in the Church. That God makes our nests prickly so that we can step into a ministry in this Church. But, I didn't get that from this scriputure. I maybe wrong. I don't know need help Please.

2007-02-05 07:11:05 · 8 answers · asked by candy_girl 2

2007-02-05 07:10:29 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Matthew 12:39-40 Jesus tells us that only evil people seek after a sign, but the only one that will be given is the Resurrection. John 6:44, tells us that only the Father can draw people to Christ. The miracles that Jesus did were fulfillment of prophecy that pointed Him out for who He is. Another good example of this were the people of the Exodus, these people saw the Red Sea parted, the pillar of fire by night, the pillar of dust by day, they ate the mana, and still they rebelled, do NOT rely on miracles to save people. Our job is to speak the truth in love and then step back to allow the Holy Spirit to do His work. The Holy Spirit is the one who convinces someone that they are a sinner, John 16:8, He warns of judgment to come, John 16:11, He tells us of the righteousness of Christ, John 16:10 and He guides us in all truth, John 16:13. Please stop trying to get people to believe because of miracles, this is blasphemy. STOP ARGUING! It is futile and vain and does not serve to edify.

2007-02-05 07:10:21 · 4 answers · asked by HAND 5

Should the Pope allow the Latin Mass (1962 Missal) to be celebrated universally, alongside the Novus Ordo?

2007-02-05 07:10:17 · 2 answers · asked by Zindo 1