There is no possible naturalistic explanation for the origin of matter/energy which does not contravene the laws of nature, and there is no possible, naturalistic explanation for the origin of life anywhere in the universe which does not contravene the laws of nature (according to laws of nature, matter/energy which are finite cannot simply arise of their own accord from nothing. According to the Law of Biogenesis life cannot arise spontaneously from inert matter. According to information theory, the information within the universe which governs life etc. could not have simply arisen from matter. Information can only originate from an intelligent source).
Beliefs such as the ‘Big Bang’ theory, the spontaneous generation of life and evolution, all defy natural law. But because they are naturalistic events, they are bound by natural laws and cannot possibly contravene them. How can it be logical to assume that they could?
2007-01-01
07:10:55
·
35 answers
·
asked by
A.M.D.G
6