People point to mutations in bugs with legs growing out their heads or something to that nature and say "proof of evolution." But really, comeon, for evolution to work, wouldn't we have seen SOME change in the past 4 thousand years?
For evolution to work, we have to be contantly mutating gaining something in at least a few of them, but the only mutating we see are vile and harmful, yet they remain.... which is against the teaching of evolution.
Might say, "well medical tech" or something like it, but yet 4000 years ago our tech wasn't snot.
I hear some arguments that we are the pinacle of evolution, which also doesn't make sense... there is always room to grow.
I am VERY serious and trying to understand the argument supporting evolution. Right now, it seems only like an excuse against religion...
Tell me, what are your real thoughts on how this works please and thank you.
2006-08-20
16:31:39
·
22 answers
·
asked by
WhiteHat
6