ive came across a website tht describes a grizzly bear would be a better choice regarding my question above http://www.lairweb.org.nz/tiger/conflict... but i am still have doubt with it...this is because,polar bear got the longest canine teeth compared to others in bear family and no doubt they are design tht way to "kill" their prey(seal,walrus,penguins etc.). Plus,polar bear's palm is so strong tht when combine with their weight,they could even break thick layer of ice to hunt meal underneath(e.g fish). And when fighting,bears will normaly stand up to show their size and strength. So,how could grizzly wins when polar are bigger in size?? But,what if they are equal in size?? Who will win?? Polar got longer canine teeth,big strong palm,thick layer of fat while grizzly on the other hand got strong jaw,longer claws,and more muscular(tht what the website tell,but im not sure bout this one).Erm,so i do hope anyone with real facts will answer my doubtnes...Thank you. >_<
2006-07-11
21:44:50
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous