English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

2007-03-25 20:34:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 20:34:12 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 20:23:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anurupa 1

If we were able to visit the moon 38 years ago why have we not made very much progress when it comes to space travel?

Its seems like we have moved up in every technology but space travel.

2007-03-25 20:22:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think, to me, it is the most interesting subject. Please, take 2 minutes out and tell me what you think lies past our universe.

Are we just some structure, in a even larger structure? ( Are we a cell in some enormous, object? )

Entertain me, and tell me what you think we are here for. Why we even exist or what we are a part of.

2007-03-25 20:10:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

My current boyfriend is the kindest man I've ever dated. Lately, he has been stepping on my bare feet, elbowing me in the face and knocking out my teeth. The last one was pure fiction. He just seems really clumsy these days and I commented that he might be subconsiously be angry with me. He smiled in a very innocent way but I wonder...

2007-03-25 19:28:04 · 8 answers · asked by daisyjzmum 4

2007-03-25 19:16:53 · 19 answers · asked by divinemadness 4

If i bought a bunch of helium balloons, can i fly away? how many to buy? What if they are in the winnnie the pooh shape?

2007-03-25 18:01:38 · 15 answers · asked by Jimmy John 2

That at this moment in space every thing is blowing up and moving faster and slower and planets being made, destroying to

2007-03-25 17:57:11 · 4 answers · asked by beave00720002000 2

If no space or matter existed in the beginning, only God, or whatever caused it all, then wouldn't it be safe to say that this "whatever cause" took up all the space there was in existence?

If all this space was taken up, then in order to create anything new wouldn't space have to be created first?

How would you create space if it was already taken up by something?

So, in order to create space in an already filled up place, wouldn't you have to create a division in the existing substance?

Then wouldn't you have to divided that substance with enough distance that you could fit all the things you wanted to create?

After creating that big division to fit all that you wanted to create, wouldn't all the substance that previously took up all the space be scattered about this space as a result of this dividing process?

Would this scattered substance be the stuff we see all over the universe?

2007-03-25 17:44:59 · 11 answers · asked by DW 2

.*.well you see, I had to wright a poem for my gift class, do you
think this is good?

with love that's forever strong,
I shine like stars in the deepest darkest nights.
I burn like the sun that is long to burn out.
I race like a shooting star across the midnight sky.
I wander like a child lost in the outer lengths of space.
To forever hold peace,
In the imagination of a place never seen!
Forever will I wander through space.

2007-03-25 16:49:44 · 9 answers · asked by wakeupangel 1

2007-03-25 16:28:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 16:14:03 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

My friend and I are doing a project on the Aquarius Constellation and our teacher asked us to find certian things and we have been looking for a few days now and can't find this information:
~3 deep sky objects
~and the two brightest stars(or major)
~fascinating facts about the constellation Aquarius (include name and description of at least 2 deep sky objects)
~the nickname of aquarius
IF you know plzz help thnx

**PLZ note that this is what our teacher has on the paper so if u ask us what does that mean we don't know ethier

2007-03-25 15:14:33 · 3 answers · asked by [♥[Megan]♥] 2

When I say Apollo 13 I just mean the computing power onboard, not totalled with the mission control computers.

2007-03-25 15:08:33 · 1 answers · asked by douglasbrender 1

y scientifically are they not planets?

2007-03-25 15:07:18 · 11 answers · asked by lilian 1

Also the radio telescope and space probes

thanks a bunch

2007-03-25 14:48:38 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

formula E=mc^2,

A.when two masses collide, we always get a lot of light
B.a little bit of mass can be converted into a substantial amount of energy
C.energy can travel much faster than light (in fact its speed can be the speed of light squared)
D.mass has to travel at the speed of light before it can produce any energy

I pretty sure its D.

2007-03-25 14:46:46 · 10 answers · asked by ast10177 1

2007-03-25 14:41:39 · 3 answers · asked by Leslie M 1

I think next to human creation the polar aurora is the most beautiful work of God I ever seen but when I see pictures I never see people no where around is it because of the particales,gases etc or people just aren't allowed in those areas?????

2007-03-25 14:27:43 · 2 answers · asked by thowbackyungin504 1

2007-03-25 14:09:29 · 5 answers · asked by jrivera_e17 2

Why we get 'Time to live Exceeded in Transit message' & what does it means

2007-03-25 14:06:04 · 4 answers · asked by lekh raj b 1

should the government spend research money on programs to search for asteroids and comets with earth crossing orbits?

2007-03-25 13:56:08 · 6 answers · asked by Jeffrey A 1

2007-03-25 13:49:57 · 11 answers · asked by wiccan_phrogg 1

fedest.com, questions and answers