All women in the world had their hymen torn before they ever gave birth to their first child. All the women in the world, without a single exception, were born to mothers who no longer have their hymen. Yet, we never heard of a mutation caused by womens' loss of their hymen. We never heard of a new "strain" of women who are born without a hymen. Single rare and random cases - yes. But, as a permanent mutation - no.
If "evolution" is right, this change in the body started "millions of years ago", ever since the first woman appeared in the world. For animals with hymens, this change started even earlier than for humans. So, why didn't females "evolve" into females without hymens?
Isn't that sufficient and convincing factual evidence to prove that "evolution theories" are nonsense?
2007-10-13
15:20:57
·
8 answers
·
asked by
brandlet
2
in
Biology