Politics - 5 November 2007

At least she wouldn't try to be a King.

2007-11-05 06:50:28 · 28 answers · asked by whirling W dervish 2

I'm wondering if the two vetoes are connected. Given that children are more dependent than adults on natural sources of water, that lack of quality water will be unhealthy for children, and that several million will be denied health care due to his SCHIP veto, when you tie it all together you have the frightening possibility that Bush is taking a clever approach to harming children. And it really comes together when you consider that SCHIP recipient children, being relatively poor, are more likely to grow up to be Democratic voters, if they live that long. This is a serious question. Those who can't handle the truth need not answer.

2007-11-05 06:49:55 · 15 answers · asked by golfer7 5

2007-11-05 06:48:00 · 19 answers · asked by G's Random Thoughts 5

ttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071104/ap_o...

Killing fellow Muslims can't be helping there cause. When will the peace loving Muslims around the world publicly denounce terrorism and stamp it out of their religion?

The solution seems to lie within themselves. If they continue to allow this within their religion the world will continue to live with terrorism, including themselves.

If 2% of Muslims are nut cases that's 500,000 the world has to deal with. Could it all end with a few words changed in the Koran? Something like peace on earth, good will toward men?

2007-11-05 06:47:12 · 9 answers · asked by labdoctor 5

2007-11-05 06:41:23 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-05 06:38:28 · 22 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

Or will America remain on a path of destruction?

2007-11-05 06:36:41 · 21 answers · asked by ireneee 1

Statistics being what they are and averages being averages I would suspect that we would have thousands of arrests each year of family members of police officers .
So why is it I tried a few searches and came up empty handed . Help me find arrests of law enforcements family members please .

2007-11-05 06:34:31 · 6 answers · asked by TroubleMaker 5

http://www.newunionism.net/library/member%20contributions/news/Unionism%20and%20Economic%20Performance.htm

2007-11-05 06:25:43 · 13 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

2007-11-05 06:22:31 · 43 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

2007-11-05 06:21:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Im writing a persuasive essay about why the world should be goverened by one government.
Can you tell me why or why not it would be a good idea
please include as much detail as you can

Please answer ASAP
thank you

2007-11-05 06:21:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-05 06:20:57 · 36 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh?

and why aren't we free to make that choice on our own?

2007-11-05 06:18:23 · 17 answers · asked by nostradamus02012 7

I mean when I see conclusive proof that I am wrong about something be it what i Believe to be true or just a certain viewpoint, I change my thinking. But I have heard tons of Liberal people get so angry they start yelling if you challenge them. Especially the HildaBeast.

2007-11-05 06:17:24 · 20 answers · asked by Tony_cipriani 2

Why have we not gotten rid of this department yet, when it costs 67,200 Million per year, and in its own words is only for...
1.Establish policies reguarding federal financial aid, administers, and monitors those funds.
2. Colects and oversees research on americas schools, and gives this info out.
3. "Identifies major problems" in schools,and "focuses national attention on them".
4. Enforces federal anti descrimination policies reguarding school and loans

The same ed.gov site then ends with
("Under the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Nothing specific is said about education in the Constitution; therefore it falls outside federal authority.")

WHY DO WE HAVE THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STILL!

2007-11-05 06:16:04 · 7 answers · asked by vote_usa_first 7

2007-11-05 06:09:11 · 15 answers · asked by . 5

What kind of Presidential candidate has to blame someone else because they performed atrociously in a debate? Of course if she had any Core Beliefs she wouldn't have waffled so much and looked so inept.

2007-11-05 06:07:29 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Nor should any religion or priest have any say over what is a medical condition and what is not a medical condition. They have no authority or education in such matters. And, another example as to why abortion should NEVER be made illegal. Read the article before you comment.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071105/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/nicaragua_abortion_ban

2007-11-05 06:06:16 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is after all her own side "attacking" her,and making her look like a fool.

2007-11-05 06:02:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

So I guess she's going to get back to figuring out where she stands on the issues,maybe?

2007-11-05 06:00:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Help me on this.... and which State.?

2007-11-05 05:59:08 · 19 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2

I don't understand why some peopel wouldn't want more security around our borders? Is there a reason i am not aware of that may make the border wall a bad idea?

2007-11-05 05:57:42 · 14 answers · asked by Tx Guy 3

Wouldn't it be easier to just be the "Right Wing Spin Machine" that everyone accuses them of being. Or is their balanced approach the reason they have more viewers than all the other "major networks" combined.

2007-11-05 05:57:38 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-05 05:56:43 · 10 answers · asked by jongcr 1

Worthless currency, tremendous foreign debt, rising cost of goods, stagnant wages, housing crisis, skyrocketing inflation or all of the above....
Because all those things are already happening.

2007-11-05 05:56:06 · 5 answers · asked by The President 3

Quoted from a source: "The most prevalent question is why there are so many blacks in poverty. Liberals argue that it is the result of continuing racism and discrimination, especially at hiring time. Conservatives have argued a variety of other causes: moral shortcomings, poor work ethic, even intellectual inferiority. Another important question is whether welfare causes poverty."
What do you think?

2007-11-05 05:54:02 · 24 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

There are some territoires that may want to be a state.

2007-11-05 05:47:47 · 19 answers · asked by cavestroctfsl 1

Dems pretend to care about individual rights, as long as you're part of a historically repressed minority. And then when it comes time to actually write policy, well, they actually don't support homosexual marriage - and they don't actually reform the war on drugs, if anything, Clinton cracked down as hard as Reagan.

Reps pretend to care about individual rights too, but only if you own a gun or have a radio show. They talk about the bill of rights and the 2nd amendment, but when the party brass gets together to pick a front-runner they decide on Rudy.

By all calculations, the two parties are incredibly "authoritarian," a term that applies equally well to the left or the right. Whether its warrantless searches or smoking laws or media regulation, there's no party with a real libertarian or freedom agenda.


So why do they feel the need to hide behind a few sham libertarian positions? Why do party loyalists reward them for verbal idealism and legislative tyranny?

2007-11-05 05:46:51 · 3 answers · asked by freedom first 5

control?

Why aren't people allowed to express their views just because it might offend someone?

2007-11-05 05:46:47 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous