At least she wouldn't try to be a King.
2007-11-05 06:50:28 · 28 answers · asked by whirling W dervish 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wrong you are ken, Hillary's total objective is socialist totalitarianism. She will tax the country out of prosperity and into government service, all the while making you think that it is for your own good!
2007-11-05 06:54:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 7⤊ 8⤋
Hillary will be a great improvement over what we have now. Many conservatives haven't been concerned about how Bush has expanded Executive power but you'll hear them yelling and screaming about the issue when Hillary is president.
2007-11-05 07:04:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Rudy has Napoleon syndrome in spades.
2007-11-05 07:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is Bush without the word Republican after her name. She has supported almost the entire Bush agenda. In fact, she was a Goldwater supporter while in high school and she was president of The Young Republicans while at Wellesley College.
The same thing was true of John Kerry who ran for president basically on the platform of "I can promote the Bush agenda better than Bush. It is time we came to the conclusion that the Democrats and the Republicans are both parties that represent the interests of the U.S. wealthy elite. The differences are so minor as to be irrelevant -- which is why the Democrats refuse to impeach the criminal Bush or end his imperialist war.
2007-11-05 06:54:11 · answer #4 · answered by Nighthawke 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
There will be no sparing of any sort of syndromes with our current health care system.
2007-11-05 06:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Veronica S 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, Hillary is as self-serving as Bush, only smarter and more vicious in her quest for power.
She doesn't have a Napoleon complex, she has a Hillary complex.
She doesn't care what the title is, as long as she is #1 and in the spot light.
2007-11-05 06:59:37 · answer #6 · answered by Frank 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If youre referring to Geo Bush II, he isnt short enough to have Napoleon complex - but he is rife with Delusions of grandeur.
2007-11-05 06:54:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Who told you she does not want to be King? She clearly stated on ABCTV TheView she would multi task and be First Lady too if elected (she said when). It's a bi-partisan title she would love to be adorned with. Look way back at her Marxist roots and her studies ... she will be Living History alright. Actually hoping to RE-WRITE it is my educated guess. Thanks for asking.
*if you think the Bush dynasty is bad just wait ! Imagine your surprise when u find out...
2007-11-05 07:02:22 · answer #8 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are correct! She wouldn't try to be King she would be Queen Hillary! The smartest woman on the planet! Please. Where did you come up with this one? George Bush isn't short enough to suffer from a Napoleonic complex.
2007-11-05 06:54:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Hillary is one of the scariest individuals of whom I can think. Read 1984. Don't be fooled by the media: This election won't be about the war. They just want you to think that. It's going to be about preventing the socialization of our national economy. PS Hillary voted for the war.
2007-11-05 06:59:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Hillary didn't dump Bill, despite knowing how much he was cheating on her for years. Still hasn't, for that matter. This to me indicates a massive inferiority complex, or a dangerous political calculation. What makes you think that these aren't indications of an existing Napoleon Syndrome?
2007-11-05 06:55:45 · answer #11 · answered by ima_super_geek 4 · 1⤊ 7⤋