Politics - 27 October 2007

Good point. Gore is no longer a senator.

2007-10-27 05:25:00 · 38 answers · asked by Duminos 2

2007-10-27 05:19:24 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 05:17:16 · 6 answers · asked by charbatch 3

In Germany many people think so. I am one of them. Here she is in high repute.
What ist your opion?

2007-10-27 05:07:25 · 7 answers · asked by Mylady 7

In the name of peace?

2007-10-27 04:37:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just heard on the radio today that those without insurance in SoCal are eligible for a FEMA check of $28k to help them rebuild/replace. Why was the ability to rebuild/replace only assessed at $2k for Katrina? I understand that the cost of living is higher in CA than LA, but to the tune of $26k difference? Let's talk about personal accountability here, as well, this is for UNinsured people.

2007-10-27 04:20:18 · 15 answers · asked by momatad 4

With 360, mash, multiply, myspace and a host of others how could they ever successfully monitor for a terrorist plot?

2007-10-27 04:20:15 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 04:13:34 · 20 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Believe it or not, I think it could still be the USA.

Although who knows what could happen over such a long time.

100 years from now the USA could have 88 states, and it may not even be called the USA. And we could just be getting over World War VI.

But seriously, in 100 years the concept of the nation state will not be what it is today. The USA could still be on top, but so could China, India, or even Russia.

It will be a very different world.

2007-10-27 04:12:18 · 15 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

Even though Islam is a peaceful religion in the same way cristeanity is???
please no troling or slander.

2007-10-27 04:06:49 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 03:56:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 03:54:57 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 03:49:42 · 14 answers · asked by Spartacus 3

2007-10-27 03:48:12 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

When two super powers ruled the world, there was no need for small countries, like Iran, to develop nuclear weapons. Every country on the planet was protected by the nuclear shield of either the USA or the USSR. MAD kept the peace.
Does the world need a Ying and Yang, like the USA and the USSR, to keep a balance.

2007-10-27 03:46:48 · 12 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5

I look at its stance on reproductive rights, government surveillance, and pre-emptive war, and have to say they are a great obstacle to freedom.

2007-10-27 03:41:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am going to be asking this question 3 times today, and will be tallying up the amount of
Radicals, Liberals, Moderates, Consevatives, Reactionarys

2007-10-27 03:37:35 · 12 answers · asked by Andrew T 3

2007-10-27 03:29:24 · 11 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

2007-10-27 03:22:30 · 21 answers · asked by Duminos 2

Rudy will give the green light for Israel to kill all the Palestinians, is that what you American Jews want?

2007-10-27 03:16:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am 29, married and have two children in elementary school. I have worked very hard, and done without "necessities" like a cell phone or cable, to make sure my children have health insurance. I pay money into a social security system and will never see a dime of that money, so I work an extra job to save for retirement. I have never felt entitled to anything and pride myself in doing right by my children. I'm not against helping those in need, but I don't think I should be forced to take on the financial shortcomings of the entire country's poor, lazy or illegal population.

2007-10-27 02:54:26 · 27 answers · asked by ? 2

2007-10-27 02:48:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudy_Giuliani

2007-10-27 02:41:44 · 8 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Nuclear weapons will not go away, much to the chagrin of most people. They are the great equalizer and provide security for small countries against attack by a larger power.
Is it any wonder that countries like Iran are scrambling to develop nuclear weapons after the USA invaded Iraq. You counld bet you bottom dollar that the USA would have never invaded Iraq had the country had a nuclear shield.
If Iran gets nuclear weapons, the USA would be unable to invade Iran and remove its government. Is this the principal reason our government is fighting the Iranian nuclear program?
All bad regimes disappear over time. There is little need for the USA to have the ability to invade a country at will to remove a despot or an ideology we don't agree with.
Why the continued fuss over Iran's desire to develop nuclear weapons? There are alway enough nuclear weapons to kill the planet 10 times over. What does it matter if there's a few more?

2007-10-27 02:39:58 · 12 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5

why?

2007-10-27 02:31:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-27 02:24:22 · 15 answers · asked by charbatch 3

I think we should do the following:

1) Knock out the power grid
2) Knock out bridges and main streets.
3) Then hit the nuclear sites that exist
4) Hit all government buildings
5) Hit universities where radical Islam is taught.

Just an idea...what do you think?

2007-10-27 02:18:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the event Hilary Clinton becomes President she will have achieved something very unique. First, she will go down in American history as the first woman President which for centuries had been dominated by men. Second, she will be the first American First Lady to become President. It would be interesting to watch how she would perform.

2007-10-27 02:15:05 · 10 answers · asked by Lei Al 2

can't we settle this nuclear problem with Iran by allowing them to have defensive nuclear weapons provided they agree that the rest of the world has the right to incinerate their country if they ever used them aggressively? And, the security and accountability of the weapons must be internationally monitored.

2007-10-27 02:08:43 · 12 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5

it has to be done & has to be bofore he leaves office, so when???

2007-10-27 01:59:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous