can't we settle this nuclear problem with Iran by allowing them to have defensive nuclear weapons provided they agree that the rest of the world has the right to incinerate their country if they ever used them aggressively? And, the security and accountability of the weapons must be internationally monitored.
2007-10-27 02:08:43 · 12 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There are tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.
2007-10-27 02:15:03 · update #1
Several reasons why a Nuclear Iran would be bad.
1. Nukes would be offensive
2. They would give nuke to terrorists and deny they had anything to do with it.
3. Their power and influence in the region would be much greater.
2007-10-27 09:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does no longer make any distinction in any respect, Iran can't use nuclear weapons, regardless of if that they had them. you quite think of the united states of a will stand by ability of and enable Iran use nuclear bombs on Israel ? you think of Israel does no longer respond by ability of sending their 80 warheads decrease back in revenge ? One bomb despatched and bye-bye Iran. No, they do no longer desire that ! Nuclear weapons can in basic terms be used as a deterrent, no longer a weapon of aggression ! forget what Ahmadinijad says, he has quite no ability in Iran. he's in basic terms an fool with a great gob, all he needs to do is galvanize. very equivalent to how an excellent type of individuals say which you should "nuke" somebody. Do you're taking any be conscious of those goons the two ? Ahmadinijad is now and back maximum appropriate in condemning Israel nevertheless. he's, after all, no longer the only one to realize this. are you able to comprehend that ?
2016-10-02 22:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have been watching the liberal news channels too much. They "forget" to report that the Head Rag Head Nutcase is needing to start WW3 so the Prophet that fell in a well a 1,000 years ago can wake up and escape to rule what will be left of the world. He has stated he will wipe out Israel so soon as he can! You want him to have defensive Nuc weapons??? USMC 60-68
2007-10-27 04:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by grizzlytrack 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off all it garbage what US is pushing for no country has right to dictate to another country What To do so F%%k US and F^^^K israel both by saying so , iam so freaking tired of all these BS and ignorant bully by US , i hate it.
oh ya don't mess with me today!!??? not healthy 4 u??!!
2007-10-27 02:43:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear weapons are in and of themselves, Offensive in nature.
2007-10-27 02:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by redlegman64 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Sure and maybe the Easter Bunny can be the monitor since they won't UN or IAEA monitor them.
2007-10-27 02:24:04 · answer #6 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we (read U.S. and Israel) do that we lose our nuclear leverage and its imperial benefits.
Our hypocrisy in this matter is no longer tenable. It's time to ban nuclear weapons worldwide. The UN resolutions in Iraq and the accompanying inspections proves that successful nuclear non-proliferation is possible.
2007-10-27 02:16:16 · answer #7 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Because they wouldn't use them defensively they would try to blow up Israel first chance they got.
2007-10-27 03:17:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's no such thing as defensive nuclear weapons.
2007-10-27 02:13:12 · answer #9 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
to be honest, they would probably have an accident and kill off their people. the problem being is that it would not stop at the borders.
2007-10-27 02:37:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋