English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-27 02:48:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Iranian government, as it's called the Islamic Republic, has raised a series of nuclear investigations in order to make some kind of nuclear energy.
But due to talks from thw White House, ther're calling for weapons. The Europe commity also has raised their hands to USA flag of war against terrorism to limit Iranian government.
I need to know your opinions on what would be the end?
1. Another war in Middle East?
2. Iran wins the file and also Iraq would be in their hands!?
3. Peace on this file and points for USA and Europe from Irans mines of energy?
4. ...?!?!

2007-10-27 03:29:54 · update #1

9 answers

Your question makes little sense. But to summarise my views on the matter -

No country should have nuclear weapons. That is the ideal situation. If nuclear weapons could be un-invented they should be. However - this is impossible, so the next best solution is mutual disarmament (everyone reduces their arsenal by 10% a year) and no new countries gain knowledge of how to make nuclear weapons.

Iran very well may want nuclear power for peaceful reasons. But they are still pretty suspicious. Iran has very large reserves of very cheap oil - and Iran also makes no secret of its hatred for Israel. In addition, Iran may see that the only way its views may be taken seriously is if it has nuclear weapons. This is not an ideal situation - and though this view may be slightly justifiable in the lieu of random invasions by superpowers it is STILL no excuse to develop WMD.

Of course, it would be absolute suicide for Iran to use their nuclear weapons if they ever came into possession of any - the US and certainly Israel (if they do indeed have nuclear weapons) would wipe Iran off the map. Even letting it be suggested that Iran wants nuclear weapons is a very foolish thing for Iran to let be bandied about.

2007-10-27 06:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1 0

well!! my friend there is no way!! that the west is going to stand by and let a violent Islamic ruler like yours have a nuclear weapon. he has already threatened to whipe Israel off the face of the earth. and after 9/11 and the many Islamic terrorist attacks that have followed since, the western world does not trust Islam. if your country doesnt back off from your threat. then your country will be hit. if the muslims of the world wish to make war with the west!! then the west will defend its.self. threatening to wage war with all non muslims is a bad mistake....you are threatening to take on the entire modern western world. America has enough nuclear bombs to burn your entire country off the face of the earth without even noticing. so why are you all so geared up to fight the west?? Iraq was terrible enough, and that was done with conventional weapons and bombs. if i were you i would be trying to get some people to see sence in your country.

2007-10-27 11:19:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In a pentagon report describing the effectiveness of the bombing campaign to eliminate the nuke facilities and the presidential palace of Adolf Abeminajab, I hope.

2007-10-27 10:01:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

The bin, as they're too inbred to get the damn thing to work.

2007-10-27 09:51:17 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Walrus 1 · 0 1

lol tony blair givin up n leavin

2007-10-27 10:43:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your question doesn't make any sense.

2007-10-27 10:21:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Israel....provided I understand your question as you meant it.

2007-10-27 09:56:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your question doesn't make sense.

2007-10-27 09:51:03 · answer #8 · answered by resignedtolife 6 · 0 1

Please rephrase your question so we can better understand it.

Thanks

2007-10-27 10:02:25 · answer #9 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers