Politics - 17 July 2007

Or would they have accused him of fearmongering?

2007-07-17 07:20:50 · 9 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070716/ap_on_go_ot/workers_drug_use;_ylt=AmiGIr21zHmzPrRI7rjTxZeyFz4D

2007-07-17 07:18:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not saying BUSH flew the plane himself into the WTC, but isn't it suspicious that he would refuse an independent panel of investigation?

2007-07-17 07:16:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 07:08:29 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

O'Donnell kept to her word, contributing $2,300 to his campaign, the maximum donation for the primary, while Maher chipped in $1,000. They were among the more than 50 contributions that Franken, a former "Saturday Night Live" star, received from actors, writers, producers and others in the last reporting period, his campaign finance report shows.

2007-07-17 07:08:07 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Today, someone decided to imply an American conspiracy to kill our own people in an un-replyable message to my 360 blog.
Now, I'm not prone to delving too deeply in these, but is there really any support for these seemingly logical arguments?

It does amaze me that someone who neither claims nor supports such an argument with independent research of the WTC, Physics or the War on Terror would attack my blog as "misinformation" when all of it is either documented and/or personal experience in both battle fronts.

(No, I do not have personal experience of all 350,000+ members of the Iraqi security forces but I have seen many and have independent research to back me up.)

To see the argument (if you can call it that) and my response, see my blog:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-DfkctJU7dK5B7LcNROoyVQ--;_ylt=AiNXZokI1G6zowgYXNnJS9nlAOJ3?cq=1

2007-07-17 07:08:00 · 3 answers · asked by John T 6

A man who votes for a politician who promises to let him keep more of what he has earned,

or

A man who votes for a politician who promises to give him more of the other man's money?

2007-07-17 07:07:35 · 13 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6

With doctored evidence?

2007-07-17 07:06:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

... but 50 people to run against each other for Miss USA?

Huh?

2007-07-17 07:05:56 · 14 answers · asked by Dr. G™ 5

Gullibility and Delusion is the order of the day..... right?

2007-07-17 07:02:50 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think her name was Patti Davis, I wonder why she didn't use her dad's last name?

2007-07-17 06:52:04 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

And, if people say, as long as it takes to get the job done, what is this job in the first place? Westernized Values? Oil?

2007-07-17 06:50:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 06:40:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Kim Jung shuts his reactor down...and unlike 8yrs of Clinton appeasing the little Commie troll Kim Jung Ill, Bush admin stood firm and forced 6 party talks...Plus he did not use Jimmy Carter to pedal US nuclear technology secrets to the N. Koreans for concessions.

2007-07-17 06:40:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 06:38:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 06:32:47 · 11 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

2007-07-17 06:32:06 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

But yet they have no problem believing that Clinton raped someone and killed several people, but is still walking around free? Is it like Almond Joy? Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't?

2007-07-17 06:30:36 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 06:30:32 · 2 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

With Democrats who also are financially invested with oil companies and military contracting companies.

"You know the President is really swindling support for an invasion into Iraq. It's going to happen. We should vote for it and then when it comes to light that many of the President's justifications were wrong we can claim we were lied to ....all while still settng the stage for reaping our financial gains in the future AND we can go back to our constituents and appease them for political gain."

"It's a win win situation!"

When will everyone realize that this isn't Dem vs Rep at all anymore?
It's economic globalists vs everybody else!

2007-07-17 06:30:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

would you just sit there and take it? would you something about it? Would you fight back?

2007-07-17 06:29:59 · 34 answers · asked by Csbbot 1

Aren't you excited watching History repeat it's self?

2007-07-17 06:25:59 · 12 answers · asked by ? 2

I heard he wants to end income tax and shut down most of the federal government because its not in the constitution .
That states are to be in charge . Local governments and people making decisions .
That you could go out and open a shop and sell whatever you wanted . Free markets .

2007-07-17 06:25:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Biden would like to see Iraq divided into separate states for the different groups that make up Iraq. This way, there would be less conflict as each would have its own home.

2007-07-17 06:23:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-17 06:22:58 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why soes this war seems to never end. it's lame. I think that this hole war started over nothing and Bush is not doing anything to end it . What di you people think?

2007-07-17 06:20:42 · 17 answers · asked by cherishlyn1989 1

The nation will remember that for seven years and counting there has not been a major terrorist attack on the nation since 9/11.
Bush kept us safe, far safer than any predicted. Committees can go on writing reports of this failure of this or that department, but they cannot hide the fact that Bush and his government has been competent enough to keep us safe.

The next President, like the next Congress, will continue the fight that Bush has begun, just as in all our great wars, the United States will win.

Democrats will fracture between the insanity of those who wish our defeat and the responsible wing of the party which also will do as Bush is doing but with greater modifications.

2007-07-17 06:19:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so, what do you say to the following evidence otherwise?

Prof. Naomi Oreskes surveyed 928 scientific journal articles...of these, according to Oreskes, 75% agreed with the consensus view, 25% took no stand one way or the other, and none rejected the consensus.

http://www.norvig.com/oreskes.html

Dr. Lockwood: "The evidence, quite honestly, among the scientific community that recent warming is predominantly driven by greenhouse gases is actually overwhelming. There's more debate in the public arena. The impression is often given there is a big scientific debate going on between scientists but I'm afraid it's not, it's a major consensus of greenhouse gas and a few mavericks on the outside. But mavericks are good, scepticism is fine. Somebody said about the program you're talking about, 'Scepticism is fine falsification is a completely different thing'."

Falsification refers to 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2007/1974497.ht

2007-07-17 06:16:42 · 12 answers · asked by Dana1981 7

look at yahoo as an example they hate their military they want to surrender they hate their politicians they fete the second rate ,carter gore obama and hillary clinton for example they despise strength of commitment and believe half a--ed conspiricy theorists like michael moore.Look outside your borders Ilam covets your strength and wants to destroy your very culture .WAKE UP AMERICA .

2007-07-17 06:11:43 · 14 answers · asked by joseph m 4

Or if you say it's due to "natural cycles", do you mean by variations in the sun? I assume you must, because it's not due to volcanoes. If so, what do you say to the following?

Dr. Mike Lockwood: "What we've done is a very simple straightforward analysis. We haven't used models because a lot of the climate sceptics get very upset by models; they're very difficult to understand and sometimes they can behave in a slightly strange way. So we deliberately just kept it to a simple analysis of data which showed that since 1985 the Sun actually has been getting very, very slightly less bright. A very small effect, but it's in the wrong direction to help global warming, so that was one thing. And then the cosmic rays, having reached an all-time minimum, they've been recovering ever since."

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2007/1974497.htm

As solar activity has decreased while global warming has accelerated, clearly the sun is not the culprit. Does this change your view?

2007-07-17 06:11:34 · 15 answers · asked by Dana1981 7