English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Today, someone decided to imply an American conspiracy to kill our own people in an un-replyable message to my 360 blog.
Now, I'm not prone to delving too deeply in these, but is there really any support for these seemingly logical arguments?

It does amaze me that someone who neither claims nor supports such an argument with independent research of the WTC, Physics or the War on Terror would attack my blog as "misinformation" when all of it is either documented and/or personal experience in both battle fronts.

(No, I do not have personal experience of all 350,000+ members of the Iraqi security forces but I have seen many and have independent research to back me up.)

To see the argument (if you can call it that) and my response, see my blog:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-DfkctJU7dK5B7LcNROoyVQ--;_ylt=AiNXZokI1G6zowgYXNnJS9nlAOJ3?cq=1

2007-07-17 07:08:00 · 3 answers · asked by John T 6 in Politics & Government Politics

AzRed: Those guys have truly missed their calling. They could be making mad money writing scripts for Hollywood.

2007-07-17 07:26:39 · update #1

Steve, I gave a rather thorough answer to your question in my other question.

While I recognize you pose different questions in your answer here, further answers will have to be put on hold as other business calls me.

Once again, thank you for the mature nature of your debate, even if you are on the wrong side of the coin.

2007-07-17 10:44:59 · update #2

And yes, my blog is long. I have barely scratched the surface of even the subjects I have covered and it is important for our citizens to understand the nature of the enemy we face as well as the unreported positive news of the wars we fight.

The misportrayal of the facts in the media by means of selective editing and reporting in order to meet their political and financial agendas is despicable.

A more specific response will come much later. Thank you for reading the blog. I hope you can do so with an open mind as you have requested of me.

2007-07-17 10:50:20 · update #3

Steve, I believe we could sit down and discuss issues of different points of view civily and in remain friendly.

As I pointed out in my other response, I'm going to limit my discussions of conspiracies as it is a distraction from the more imporant discussion on Al-Qaeda, their sponsored terrorist organizations, Hezbollah and its Iranian sponsors, as well as the various other terrorist organizations and cells thereof, which will not sit down at the negotiations table and do desire to kill us both.

I've heard about the evil Fed before as well and perhaps will study it further. The gold standard does sound like utopia until one remembers that in 1929 under it we had the worst depression ever known to this country.

And if an ounce of gold buys the same goods today as it did in 1933, then wouldn't it have bought much less only 2 years ago when it sold for many fewer dollars per ounce but during which time we have experienced very low inflation?

2007-07-17 17:24:03 · update #4

And once again, sanctions and embargos don't work, except as a larger strategy in war. I'll offer up as proof, Iran, Cuba and North Korea. In fact, I'd consider them cruel if used alone since only the people of the country are punished while the tyrants continue to live large. Same examples.

2007-07-17 17:28:41 · update #5

Consider this, Bin Ladin's niece lives in NYC, goes to clubs, wears jeans and no veil and hates her uncle for his part in 9/11.

Consider this: If you had 50+ brothers and sisters as well as untold numbers of step mothers, do you think it's possible that maybe one of them would be a blacksheep and possible even an evil maniac?
Do you think that your father might give him his wish of his part of the fortune and tell him to get lost? Or at least tell him to get lost, particularly after causing such shame on the family as well as costing the family a good deal of money through lost business contracts?

No man is guilty because they were unlucky enough to have a psychopathic relative.

And if you'll read my article "Regional webs of entanglement," you will note that the royal family has external control and the wahhabis have internal control and are in a precarious position to maintain power there.

2007-07-17 17:36:50 · update #6

You should also note that Saudi Arabia has taken some modest steps towards democracy in the last few years.

2007-07-17 17:40:05 · update #7

3 answers

The events of 11 September 2001 were tragic, indeed. The *only* thing the government didn't do was shoot the planes out of the sky. I would have.

Conspiracy theories are fun, but no one is supposed to believe them. Many do.

2007-07-17 07:20:58 · answer #1 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 1 0

John T.--I can only say that I have read some of your blog. It is rather long.

Is it possible Hitler killed his own people? Why would it be so hard to believe that there is some truth to an American conspiracy?

We have Donald Rumsfeld and Bush, Sr. (who had major dealings with Sadaam Hussein in the 80's and Osama bin Laden as well).

Here is some food for thought--is it at all possible that the bin Laden's (that live in Saudi Arabia) said either that they wanted nothing to do with their son or that they didn't support his beliefs simply to make it look like they were just distancing themselves from him so that no connection could be made to them?

Just to get you to thinking more. Do you know who has major ties to the Carlyle Group? The answer is this--the Bush family and the bin Laden's.

Here's one other thing to dwell on--why are we such good allies with Saudi Arabia when they don't believe in democracy?

Aren't we suppose to spread democracy? Aren't we suppose to impose sanctions (or take some action(s)) to get our democracy put in place in their country?

So the big question is this--why haven't we?

John T.--I, too, have to admit I like the way we are civil with each other. So I'm on one side of the coin and you're on the other. Of course, I believe you're on the wrong side, but hey, that's what makes our talks with each other pretty cool.

I do believe that you and I could sit down and discuss this topic for hours on end and still end up being friends.

One topic of interest (which I hope you'll find time to look into) is the fact that congress has no oversight of how much money is being printed. The Federal Reserve Bank (isn't Federal and is a privately owned corporation) doesn't do M3 reporting anymore.

M3 reporting allowed congress to have oversight of how much money is being printed up.

The more money they print up, the less value a Federal Reserve Note has. Right now a one dollar Federal Reserve Note is worth about four cents.

Consider this as well--in 1933, one ounce of gold was worth about twenty dollars. Today, gold is well over six hundred dollars an ounce. The irony of this is that it still buys the same amount of goods now as it did back in 1933.

If we were on the gold standard, we wouldn't have inflation, deflation, recessions or depressions. We would have a very stable economy.

The reason I bring this up is because we are seriously (as a country) on the verge of bankruptcy. And we keep spending money on the wars in the middle east and it's coming at the expense of our civil liberties.

Go to youtube.com and type in Ron Paul and you'll see he's all for what the constitution stands for. He didn't vote for us to go into Iraq to begin with.

2007-07-17 10:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The entire factor is so bizarre that it's difficult to take a position what will have particularly occurred. As lengthy as we are speakme conspiracy theories, I'll enterprise to pose two probabilities: 1st- The McCann's deliberate a false abduction with the intention to come to be wealthy and popular 2d- The woman has particularly been abducted, however they recognize who took her and/or why she was once taken and they are now not telling someone due to the fact that it could screen anything approximately them they do not wish to be identified. -The first choice could provide an explanation for why they're so calm, why they're appearing the best way they’re appearing. It does not look most probably, even though this present day you by no means recognize. -The moment choice turns out inconsistent with the reality they're growing such a lot exposure. it could nevertheless provide an explanation for why they decline to return again to the UK. This probability could be even worse than the primary, seeing that it signifies that they particularly do not care an excessive amount of approximately the woman. I can’t believe of any longer.

2016-09-05 14:58:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers