Politics - 10 November 2006

When they raise it will people be able to get married,buy new houses and cars.Will their lives improve drastically,marginaly or not at all?

2006-11-10 03:32:16 · 21 answers · asked by Dr. NG 7

I think the 2 indipendents are in the best position. Imagine all the Vacation property the lobbyist will give them. Lieberman Got 15 new Caddilacs yesterday.

2006-11-10 03:10:23 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 02:56:42 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

as well as the Republican ones, kinda like a double tax.

2006-11-10 02:49:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 02:46:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 02:44:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

To 'clone' another user for the purpose of fooling others into believing terrible things about them ??

Would you EVER do it ? OR Do you have Too much Class to ever even consider it ?

2006-11-10 02:43:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 02:38:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 02:35:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I realise that many libs simply hate Conservatives, Republicans, and anyone who does not GroupThink like them. This question is for the Libs who actually care about the issue, not simply hating the people.

2006-11-10 02:34:26 · 29 answers · asked by Raalnan5 2

yes or no? I got confused...

2006-11-10 02:28:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Democrats in California need a candidate that can WHUP Schwansinhammer(That's a joke) in a fight? Is Jesse Ventura a Dem? What's he doin'? Angeledes is a whimp, look at those ears, he looks like a monkey.

2006-11-10 02:28:13 · 5 answers · asked by Raymond 6

For white Americans only.

2006-11-10 02:24:56 · 14 answers · asked by Albert 1

Webster's says -- a binding Promise or Agreement to do or forbear.

Remember the part about .. . .. ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE , with Liberty and Justice for ALL ??

So Let's UNITE and Stop Fighting amongst ourselves.. . AGREE?

2006-11-10 02:20:43 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Those of you who have watched liberty slip away in the name of security, as warned by Benjamin Franklin, will you please tell us about your experiences under a "secure" regime with less and less personal liberty?

2006-11-10 02:16:54 · 6 answers · asked by auntb93again 7

http://zionismexplained.org/map/landmap1.jpg

2006-11-10 02:10:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Time for a return to a secular Pledge of Allegiance

1923
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.

1924
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.

1954
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

2006
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands: one nation enlightened by reasoned, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

2006-11-10 02:07:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Being raised by a Mother and Father or 2 Fathers?

:)

2006-11-10 02:07:13 · 7 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood:) 1

-terrorists claim they are doing the work of God, but they blow up a building filled with children and other civilians
-Israelis claim they are angels, but their military kills civilians and their government is corrupt
-neo-Nazis say they are doing good, but they wish to killl every non-white in the world
-our presdident says he believes in giving Amricans many rights, yet he wiretapps our phones
-politicians say they are honest people, and they go and have sexual conduct with a minor
-communists say that we have a corupt government, but they go and blow off someone's head if they protest something and their people have no freedoms
-terrorists say they worship peace and tolerance, but they support Hitler and the Third Reich
-Palestinians say all they want is a peace of land and that would solve evertyhing, but they say they want every Israeli and Jew dead

Does everyone agree that this is a highly hypocritical world?

2006-11-10 01:59:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 01:54:42 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

:)

2006-11-10 01:53:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Them animals who kill people specialy inocent people and children for no logical reason while they being concious of what they are doing, such as terroist or bombers.
These fo--s should not be given triles, they should be shot on the spot. They need not be given the opportunity to kill others ever again, just in case the court system fails to jail them for life.
they are not soldiers, they are killers, they need no GENIVA PROTECTION, shoot them on the spot, and be done. One less future terrorist.

2006-11-10 01:52:34 · 4 answers · asked by boby223 2

I'm a white educated working class i.e no privelegdes, no big house in plush suburb.

2006-11-10 01:46:48 · 24 answers · asked by cahoonr 1

i was born and raised there -in Palestine- and never had a life where truth is shown...you see that Israel is the poor country fighting terrorism ..well THAT IS TOTALY WRONG
i lived there for more than 17 years. and saw everything that happens there
i saw our house being shot at by Israel soldier knowing that me and my sis and 3 baby brothers were there only...saw my friend coming to school crying cause her dad was killed by a bomb
i saw blood all over the streets in "ramallah"and lots of places
i saw who has rocks and who has guns
i saw an Israel soldier killing boy 12 years old because he was throwing ROCKS
i know and we all know that more than 8000 are in Israel jails and no Israel soldier in Palestinians jails except one, only one
so who is killing who
i wrote this to see what u really think? Maybe i could show u what my eyes saw alive not what bbc and cnn and abc news lied to me. remember 80 Palestinians KILLED and 200 INJURED only in SIX DAYS
http://www.ifamericansknew.com/

2006-11-10 01:40:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am speacing in the international sense here folks. Certainly there are Americans that are disatvantaged, Economically, Racially, Educationally and by mental handicap. However, Are not the Overwhelming number of people classified by the Gov't as below the poverty line vastly better off than better off than most of the people in the the rest of the world classified as "Poor". Make no mistake this is not a defense of the current state in America nor am I advocating doing nothing about the current status quo about those below the poverty line in America. I am however asking has the term "poor" being used more as a political hot button and is somewhat inaccurate in relation to those considered poor in the rest of the world particularly the third world. Do not America's "Poor" have a vastly supperior lifestyle than those considered poor in the majority of the globe. Does not the use of the term Poor in the American sense desensitize us to the term in it's international reality.

2006-11-10 01:37:30 · 14 answers · asked by JstAnOldDad 1

Pre war intelligence?
Warrantless wiretapping?
Secret foreign prisons?
No-bid defense contracts?

What?

2006-11-10 01:36:09 · 9 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

Nothing more than a Neo-Conservative Agenda to get the Democrats to 'cowl down' to them ???

Read my last 2 questions.. . .. .I called for UNITY. . . . They responded with Divisivenss.

2006-11-10 01:34:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 01:33:55 · 14 answers · asked by buffman316 2

Anyone who doesn't see it that way, should look at my previous Q/A.. .. . .Abhorent !!!

2006-11-10 01:19:07 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 01:10:41 · 22 answers · asked by ct22hoop 1