Politics - 10 November 2006

2006-11-10 16:26:20 · 17 answers · asked by dstr 6

The Minority Republican Party always whines and complains, they spent the last few years since 1994 causing corruption and mayhem in America.

Should the Majority Democrat Party just ignore them and fix the damage cause by christians and republicans?

2006-11-10 16:25:17 · 10 answers · asked by ast5792 1

When the government is re-writing the Constitution under our noses, using terrorists as a shield for their own propaganda, people need to start asking questions. If we actually had people walking into public places strapped with bombs, then maybe we ARE at such and such risk for terrorist strikes. That doesn't happen here with our very large Arab and Middle Eastern population... Makes me wonder about how much truth comes from all those bureaucrats: "The haves and the have mores" as Bush joked. The government is leading unknowing sheep in the direction they want, and people "trust" them only because people would rather have someone else do the work for them. Laziness only feels good in the now, not in the later, and ignorance is only bliss in the now and not later. What you don't know can hurt you far more than what you do know... the hurt just tends to show up later when it's usually too late.

2006-11-10 16:24:35 · 7 answers · asked by Asher 2

democrats won a landslide Victory against the corrupt republican party. Should we as patriotic americans and a Democratic Majority start investigation against the scandalous and corrupt minority republican party?

2006-11-10 16:16:29 · 14 answers · asked by ast5792 1

Gas prices are starting to go back up as of earlier this week. Did America electing the Democrats do this?

2006-11-10 16:12:22 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

A new recording Friday attributed to the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq mocked President Bush as a coward whose conduct of the war was rejected at the polls, challenging him to keep U.S. troops in the country to face more bloodshed.


I don't consider it to be real due to nonavailability of countenance. He is helping bush to get some sympathy from general public by creating fear. Actually these are the real friends of Mr. Bush.

2006-11-10 16:00:43 · 7 answers · asked by heenarandee 1

The media is playing along and saying this is his chance to fulfill his 2000 promise.

2006-11-10 15:58:22 · 14 answers · asked by elisioloyd 2

1) WMD

2) FREE IRAQI PEOPLE ( made up **** to divert the attention)

3) Hussain is a dictator

4) creating democracy

5) Iraq was a breach of security council


so neocons what other tricks you want to pull, morons!

2006-11-10 15:57:04 · 8 answers · asked by David F 2

2006-11-10 15:56:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lieberman which is pro Iraq won the election big . So much for a vote on Iraq.

2006-11-10 15:44:39 · 8 answers · asked by Fly Boy 4

Both were republicans. How will George W. Bush be regarded by furture historians?

2006-11-10 15:43:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 15:43:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 15:33:48 · 10 answers · asked by blonde101 2

do his fellow democrats resent his success for winning re-election running as an independent?

Will they continue to smear him for his Pro-Defense, America First views the way they did during his campaign?

2006-11-10 15:29:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

as a whole/majority and therefor the people are accountable for this war. Do you agree a message has now been sent that the eople disapprove of the war?

2006-11-10 15:15:10 · 17 answers · asked by Fairplay 1

2006-11-10 15:07:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I find myself saying that, too. Why are we scared of powerful women, but not scared of powerful men? For instance, I never called Bush scary even though I consider him a megalomaniac. What is wrong with our thinking?

2006-11-10 15:01:48 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I asked this during the day - I want to know what the night group say...

Do you harass people and call names in your daily life?
Do you call the police to have them "ticket" people you don't agree with?
Do you call someone an IDIOT to their face at will?
Do you judge a person standing in front of you as easily as you do one on the internet?

What I WANT TO KNOW IS - are you nicer in person or is what we see on here what we get?

2006-11-10 14:37:29 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous

like a true christian

2006-11-10 14:34:20 · 20 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Did Rumsfield quit or was he asked to take one for the team?

2006-11-10 14:27:06 · 6 answers · asked by . 4

Several weeks ago I asked that smeone provide me with pictures or other proofs showing new structures, schools,hospitals, improved electrical service in Iraq. Many became angry saying that they knew someone or that they WERE one of troops taking part in rebuilding.
ANd Now:
BAGHDAD. Nov. 10, 2006
"Bechtel Departure Shatters More Iraqi Illusions
The decision of the giant engineering company Bechtel to withdraw from Iraq has left many Iraqis feeling betrayed. In its departure they see the end of remaining hopes for the reconstruction of Iraq. The average household in Iraq now gets two hours of electricity a day. There is 70 percent unemployment, 68 percent of Iraqis have no access to safe drinking water, and only 19 percent have sewage access. Not even oil production has matched pre-invasion levels.
and there are no NEW hospitas or schools, just patch up jobs......2.3 billion dollars in taxpayer money ..Gone,
Another Bush& Co. cleanup
we were taken

2006-11-10 14:10:05 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

They will talk about philosophy, politcal issues, current events... And all the juice you can muster... In One corner- a world famous reporter from a forgien land- Borat. In the Other Corner- a man who has a nation backing him and won't back down to America's biggest threat (terrorist bears)- Stephen Colbert...

WHo would win- and why?

2006-11-10 14:00:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

bush said 2 week before the elet.that rumsfelt is to stay the next 2 years
but new he was going to let him, go depending on the outcome of
the elect.so he lied for votes noing it us going to be close .didnt wont to lose vote by letting us fineout to soon but he lost anyway???????????

2006-11-10 14:00:20 · 11 answers · asked by corflaten 1

David Obey possibly being named as Chairman of the Appropriations Committee.

This man voted SEVEN TIMES--post 9/11-- against intelligence funding.
He also has been quoted as saying Global Warming poses more of a threat than Islamic Terrorism.

Libs, please tell me you disagree with this man.

Create a scene of democratically forwarded National Security sanity, and impute it with leadership that understands the terrorists are very real-- and very dangerous.

I'm pleading for reassurance that the newly elected dems place National Security before all other considerations.

2006-11-10 13:51:21 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 13:46:10 · 15 answers · asked by Dr.O 5

Then theres Joe Lieberman,..You think he's ever voting with the Dems again after what they done to him?

2006-11-10 13:45:27 · 15 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5

2006-11-10 13:35:28 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 13:19:50 · 15 answers · asked by SWM 38 _4_ YOUNG GF 5

2006-11-10 13:19:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Where is the electorial college?
Who is in charge of it?
How do people get picked to be in it?

2006-11-10 13:17:04 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous