English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 10 November 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

Is POWER more important than "doing the right thing"?
1. They never condemn any acts of deviancy in their party
2. They have social programs which only make the recipient dependent of the government instead of self- sufficient
3. The Catholic and Christian liberals put abortion above the teachings of their church

2006-11-10 01:09:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

UNITE this country. I wish I was wrong about the terrorists and terrorists countries, when I said many times before the election, . . . . .The terrorists and their supporters will be CHEERING the loss of the Republicans ... .. . . But I was RIGHT. . . And now they're so emboldened. . . . That they're taunting us and now threatening Chemical and/or Nuclear Attacks. Check the News for yourself. . . .We are in more Danger than I ever thought .. ..

Will you Stop the Hate towards your opponents party and their supporters and Call for the Democratic ' Leadership ' to make a public STAND . . . NOW ???

2006-11-10 01:08:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Jeb or should we let Bush Senior have another go at it

2006-11-10 01:06:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 01:05:33 · 12 answers · asked by nelehtochrista 1

I think they need to start ACTING like Republicans again. No more pandering to the Democrats. WE HAD THE CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENCY and we squandered it.

2006-11-10 00:58:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

will i live thier and i think it is not hard to find peace , will allot are dying in gahza and iraq god and others died in lebanon god allot are dying but thier must be some thing people can do ?

2006-11-10 00:54:17 · 23 answers · asked by linda 1

The man is an acknowledged "recovering alcoholic" but i read today that rumors persist in the US and UK at senior level that Bush has resumed drinking. (Andrew Stephen in New Statesman)

Will a lame duck president determined to be remembered as a strong leader make a reckless move?

Please only reply if you have a serious comment. This is not a party political thing.

2006-11-10 00:53:27 · 13 answers · asked by Boring 5

2006-11-10 00:48:41 · 18 answers · asked by Bobsinclair 2

Trying to ram Bolton's confirmation and domestic spying through the lame duck congress? That's sure to smooth things over...

"Bush began efforts to get two of his most controversial decisions approved before the Democrats take over.

Along with Bolton's nomination, Bush said he would like to move forward on legislation to retroactively authorize the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program.

Bush said he would like to see action on both issues before year's end. The Democratic-controlled Congress begins its term in January."

2006-11-10 00:37:22 · 11 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

2006-11-10 00:36:08 · 12 answers · asked by Ace 1

...not to mention Vietnam, etc...but the quote is taken from former Sec. of Defense (Kennedy, Johnson) Robert McNamara's brilliant documentary, 'The Fog of War.'
He goes on to cry when talking about Curtis Lemay and the firebombing of Tokyo...100,000 Japanese killed in one night and one American wingman lost...and then the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after...
Has America been a disaster as a global empire re: its foreign policy. Is this why there is so much hatred of the US in the rest of the developing world?
Remember, the quote is from McNamara, who lived the cold war for almost 10 years....and a helluva better Sec of Defense than Rumsfeld ever made.

2006-11-10 00:13:16 · 13 answers · asked by Happier in China 2

fedest.com, questions and answers