Politics - 10 November 2006

2006-11-10 08:37:41 · 9 answers · asked by TARD 1

The Democrats gun control legislation played a big role in costing them the majority in 94, will they make the same mistake this time.

2006-11-10 08:31:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

And it stole everything in my medicine cabinet!!

2006-11-10 08:27:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 08:26:59 · 5 answers · asked by TARD 1

2006-11-10 08:25:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

i stepped in something green and squishey?

2006-11-10 08:19:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.economist.com/world/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8103528

"The biggest handout was a prescription-drug entitlement for the elderly, known as Medicare Part D, which passed by a handful of votes in 2003. It addressed a real problem: some 22% of the elderly lacked drug coverage. But it did so in the costliest way imaginable. It is not means-tested, so old people who previously paid for their own drug coverage have an incentive to mooch off the taxpayer instead. It will cost an estimated $1.2 trillion over the first ten years—making it the biggest expansion of the welfare state since Mr Bush was dancing the Alligator at Yale."

"This was less than two months after the passage of the lardiest highway bill of all time, including a $223m bridge connecting the Alaskan town of Ketchikan to an island with a population of 50."

2006-11-10 08:19:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

now can i finally get welfare, cause work is for suckers like you republicans. its time for the liberals to shine and live off everyone else.

2006-11-10 08:06:27 · 11 answers · asked by TARD 1

Many people have argued the statment "one nation under god" in our Pledge, but why? The American flag and the pledge to it is a reminder of or freedom. Isn't it

2006-11-10 08:04:30 · 9 answers · asked by Cindy G 1

Is Bush and his lies to invade responsible for the thousands of Americans and Iraqis that have died in vain.

2006-11-10 08:00:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

google all of this together: "the use of islamic militants by american and israeli militarists clinton florin krisniqi kerry clark donations milosevic "

2006-11-10 07:58:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Al Queda announced today that it was pleased Republicans lost the midterm elections. You might think they are blowing off steam, but consider the timing of this message. If Al-Queda had simply wanted to get attention, they would have announced their feelings on November 6th. But that would help the Republicans in the election. Clearly, Al-Queda is trying to repeat the incident in Spain.

http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=local&id=4749861

2006-11-10 07:50:41 · 19 answers · asked by bowlingcap 2

They did not keep God out of Government. Only the current Democrats are doing that.

2006-11-10 07:48:24 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 07:42:28 · 19 answers · asked by buffman316 2

2006-11-10 07:34:33 · 23 answers · asked by ksslrmchl 1

You have to like or respect SOMEONE from the opposite side..who?

I respect Joe Leiberman and he seems like a very likable guy.

2006-11-10 07:30:23 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

Was it more seats than Kerry cost the Dems by his refusal to apologize for the botched joke?

Did it cost Bush the Senate as well?

2006-11-10 07:30:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

are you going to ask why we didnt do more like interrogate the people who knew what was going on or tap phones to hear what kind of information they are spreading? oh yea thats unconstitutional.

2006-11-10 07:19:28 · 17 answers · asked by CaptainObvious 7

First of all, does anyone agree with me that everyone in this world is a sinner. So what makes gays much worse than murderers, rapists, adulterers, terrorists in other people's minds?

Do gay people really hurt anyone like murderers do? Or are they just trying to live their lives?

Like I said, everyone is a sinner, so where do you draw the line of which sins are more accepted?

2006-11-10 07:14:55 · 36 answers · asked by Tiny 2

2006-11-10 07:14:43 · 21 answers · asked by Hafeman 5000 4

When you post alqaeda propaganda you might as well be one of the terrorists.

2006-11-10 07:08:01 · 11 answers · asked by Its me 4

Why, when I think of the BNP, do I imagine a group of crude un-educated working class men drinking pints, having fights, hating non-whites, watching football and looking down womens tops?

Or is there more to the BNP than just the above?

2006-11-10 06:54:37 · 29 answers · asked by Chief1234 1

Al-Qaida in Iraq claims it's winning war because the Democrats were elected!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

2006-11-10 06:46:22 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was just wondering if liberals had any special activities planned? Will John Kerry be speaking?

2006-11-10 06:46:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think they will choose one day to launch over 1000 suicide bombers across the country, to me it's not far fetched and i think american's will wake up then.


what do you guys think, the next target? (white house?) what? let's try and beat the terrorist at their game by thinking outside the box

2006-11-10 06:45:40 · 16 answers · asked by browningny 1

2006-11-10 06:36:58 · 8 answers · asked by Hafeman 5000 4

The Specter-Cheney compromise would allow NSA warrantless surveillance on Americans both domestically and overseas. The compromise includes an immunity provision sought by the telecom industry for both private sector and government employees, who may have already provided private information without the proper warrants or national security letters.

The American people have a right to know the extent of these violations. If retroactive immunity is provided, we the people will lose all leverage to encourage testimony that sheds light on what happened.

What do you think should be done? Remember the 4th Amendment?

2006-11-10 06:27:03 · 3 answers · asked by big-brother 3

step 1... declare war on america
step 2 ... simply defeat america without any problem due to their consistent run of war defeats and blunders.
step 3 ... send john major to run the USA for comedy purposes
result ... no more stupid wars declared by yanks and fought by britain.

good idea or back to the drawing board ?

2006-11-10 06:05:18 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

step 1... declare war on america
step 2 ... simply defeat america without any problem due to their consistent run of war defeats and blunders.
step 3 ... send john major to run the USA for comedy purposes
result ... no more stupid wars declared by yanks and fought by britain.

good idea or back to the drawing board ?

2006-11-10 06:04:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

step 1... declare war on america
step 2 ... simply defeat america without any problem due to their consistent run of war defeats and blunders.
step 3 ... send john major to run the USA for comedy purposes
result ... no more stupid wars declared by yanks and fought by britain.

good idea or back to the drawing board ?

2006-11-10 06:03:56 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous