English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Specter-Cheney compromise would allow NSA warrantless surveillance on Americans both domestically and overseas. The compromise includes an immunity provision sought by the telecom industry for both private sector and government employees, who may have already provided private information without the proper warrants or national security letters.

The American people have a right to know the extent of these violations. If retroactive immunity is provided, we the people will lose all leverage to encourage testimony that sheds light on what happened.

What do you think should be done? Remember the 4th Amendment?

2006-11-10 06:27:03 · 3 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

YES!!
I have nothing to hide
Your life and safety and your children's safety should be more important than if the NSA might listen to me ordering a pizza or scheduling a soccer car pool

I suppose we, the American people have a right to know these 'violations' , but what good would it do us? Do we really want to prosecute the agency that protects us from terrorists?
We'd be doing Bin Laden a favor!

How can this be difficult?
There is no real privacy on a cell phone or on e-mail anyway
Are you saying its okay for the hackers to check your email but wrong for the govt to read AlQeda's email?
I cannot understand anyone opposing this unless they had something to hide
or believed in the illusion that personal privacy still exists in the information age

I understand a lot of very smart people will disagree with me
That's fine
and very American
But if you do disagree with my opinion, could you state yours?

2006-11-10 06:41:21 · answer #1 · answered by mike c 5 · 0 0

Pass it. I don't call terrorists so I'm safe.

2006-11-10 06:54:45 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 0

no (reject it)

2006-11-10 06:29:19 · answer #3 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers