2006-11-10 07:42:28 · 19 answers · asked by buffman316 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because she accomplished her goal and that was is to humiliate him and sew dissension in his ten-year in office and she is not the only one! Pelosi is a card carrying member of the socialist party and a full fledged liberal she makes about as much sense as a bunch of hammers in a wet paper bag and has the i.q. of bean dip!
2006-11-10 07:52:59 · answer #1 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Why didn't Bush say those those terrible things that he has said about democrats to her face yesterday?
I'm thinking that the answer to both questions is the same reason why neither one spoke up yesterday.
2006-11-10 15:56:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
President Bush was asked how he can work with her after all the bad things she said about him and he explained that he knows how campaigns work and that after them you HAVE to put all the bad stuff behind you and get down to work.
Look at all the bad stuff WE say to each other on here -- If we met, would WE be as mean?
2006-11-10 15:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Check out the Foreign press coverage of the luncheon.
NSA blocks most US News But Networks like DWTV show it all.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-10 15:50:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Her stance is that the Democratic Party is going to do the job that needs to be done now that they are in control and not worry about getting into a pissing contest with Bush. She's said he's incompetent in the past and as few people are disagreeing, why keep bringing it up?
2006-11-10 15:47:57 · answer #5 · answered by Debra D 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Why didn't president bush say all the terrible things he said about Representative Pelosi to her face yesterday. Buttman!
2006-11-10 15:45:49 · answer #6 · answered by courage 6 · 9⤊ 4⤋
his impressive levels of testosterone practically made her faint. how could a woman ridicule such a perfect person?
or she wanted to be professional and start off on a better foot down a better road, where trash-talking wasn't part of the equation.
2006-11-10 15:46:54 · answer #7 · answered by SammityvilleHorror 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
In politics it becomes water under the bridge following the elections.
Besides they really need to work together.
Bush doesn't want them to muck up his economy, it is his legacy.
The Dems need to pass designer legislation paying back their donors, and the president can wield the VETO pen to block it.
2006-11-10 15:48:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
What would be the point? She needs to work with the pinhead for two years. If it will make you happy, I'll say it to his face. I don't have to work with him.
2006-11-10 15:56:48 · answer #9 · answered by capu 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
the same reason he didn't say all those terrible things he said about her.
2006-11-10 15:48:51 · answer #10 · answered by Raven 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋