Both were republicans. How will George W. Bush be regarded by furture historians?
2006-11-10 15:43:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So, Warren Harding is buried in Grants tomb. Now we know the truth.
I would have to agree that Buchanan is. Bob and Tom I believe would also agree (www.bobandtom.com).
Dubya is doing fine holding his own. He inherited a mess from Billy Boy, had 9/11 dumped on his lap, massive wildfires, lots of hurricanes, and North Korea. No other president had this to deal with. The 9-11 is a NEW thing never seen in U.S. history before. Besides Dubya is just the President. He smiles and kisses babies. This one, for certian, is not calling the shots. Someone behind the scenes is doing that.
2006-11-11 00:25:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sorry NETTEL but you have got some ,if not all, your info wrong. #1 when Clinton left office he left the nation economy in surplus. #2 As for the unemployment rate, the easiest way to see it is like this when a soldier goes to fight shrubs (bush's) war someone has to enter that job here if that soldier dies that job is filled. Don't make excuses for Republicans they will always find someone to blame. As far as the main question Bush is the lowest rated president in history. Scandal and Shrub are the main reasons the republicans lost both houses of congress. Not stepping on any toes here just trying to keep facts straight.
2006-11-10 16:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by john316tdh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, James Buchanan is generally regarded as the worst US President according to most Presidential historians. But, it really makes no difference since once he leaves office there will be an undisputed worst of all time and his name is George W. Bush, the Village Idiot.
2006-11-10 15:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not true. Jimmy Carter. Bush will do fine. He faced what no other president faced and a war we've never seen before. The unemployment rate is lower now than it's been under Clinton, & He broke Clinton old Stock market record not once, twice, but three times. In Fact Bush's economy is breaking it's own record now. As for the dept. well you have 9/11, Katrina, and War so this make it go up. I truly think G.W is getting a bad rap.
2006-11-10 15:54:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Impossible to tell what will be said in the furture. What's paste is paste. I always heard Nixon wore the mantle when I was a youngster...
2006-11-10 18:00:59 · answer #5 · answered by ................................ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt he will take first prize as the worst of the worst, and in addition, not anywhere close to being the smartest.
Nostradamus proclaimed in one of his quatrains, that in the new world, the village idiot would step forward to lead the people.
All I can say is there is a village in Texas that can have their idiot back anytime.
Darryl S.
2006-11-10 15:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes they were. Just because Ford pardoned Nixon doesn't have any concept of him being corrupt. Remember though only Democrats have actually been attempted to get impeached. (Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton) I don't see your proof about any corrupt Republican Presidents.
2016-05-22 04:27:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry lincoln was the worst. followed now by jimmy carter.
The top 10 worst are in my opinion.
Lincoln, , carter, lbj johnson,trueman, kennedy,Grant, hoover,bush sr. bush jr.,chester allen author,
who ar eyour top 10 worst with 1 being the lowest
2006-11-10 15:59:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those losers don't come up to loser GWB's knee. He is the kind of criminal that the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the impeachment laws into the Constitution.
2006-11-10 15:52:12 · answer #9 · answered by Michael da Man 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋