Them animals who kill people specialy inocent people and children for no logical reason while they being concious of what they are doing, such as terroist or bombers.
These fo--s should not be given triles, they should be shot on the spot. They need not be given the opportunity to kill others ever again, just in case the court system fails to jail them for life.
they are not soldiers, they are killers, they need no GENIVA PROTECTION, shoot them on the spot, and be done. One less future terrorist.
2006-11-10 01:52:34 · 4 answers · asked by boby223 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A guerrilla in uniform is covered by the Geneva Convention as long as he fights according to its provisions. A terrorist is a criminal- worse than any other but more importantly just the same.
The 'Them animals....' statement could easily apply to IDF, the Iraqi security forces we sponsor, Northern Alliance thugs we also sponsor, Posada Carilles, Orlando Bosch plus the other gusanos we harbor. This hypocrisy really harms us.
If you shoot a terrorist in cold blood, perhaps not caring if civilians are close by (as in Pakistan, Yemen using Predator drones) then it is not one less future terrorist. That 'average Muslim terrorist' will have around 6 relations of military age; the civilians the same number- all with a strong revenge ethic.
Hence more bloodshed equals more terrorists. Its hard but justice is the only way- plus admittedly some intelligent violence at the right time.
2006-11-10 07:04:40 · answer #1 · answered by Peter F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorists should be hunted, and caught and while imprisoned get to see their entire families hunted down, and executed before they themselves are executed.
Once the punishment fits the crime, the incidence of crime lessens to non existance.
2006-11-10 09:57:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are unlawfull combatants. They don't deserve any rights.
2006-11-10 11:08:03 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shoot.
2006-11-10 09:54:28 · answer #4 · answered by bb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋