Politics - 9 November 2006

oh and another question now that the democrats own the senate do you think in 08 the president is going to be democrat

2006-11-09 10:39:55 · 17 answers · asked by Luis 4

2006-11-09 10:37:56 · 6 answers · asked by Gary 2

2006-11-09 10:36:23 · 15 answers · asked by Gary 2

he refers to the P.M of a great Nation as "Yo Blair"
He waves to stevie Wonder when he walks on stage.
And he stands on a ships deck and proclaims "Mission Acclomplished"
Is he the ultimate "Dip-Stick"?

2006-11-09 10:35:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

1.)Homosexuality is not natural, much like eyeglasses, polyester, and birth control.

2.)Heterosexual marriages are valid because they produce children. Infertile couples and old people can’t legally get married because the world needs more children.

3.)Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

4.)Straight marriage will be less meaningful, since Britney Spears’ 55-hour just-for-fun marriage was meaningful.

5.)Heterosexual marriage has been around a long time and hasn’t changed at all; women are property, blacks can’t marry whites, and divorce is illegal.

6.)Gay marriage should be decided by people not the courts, because the majority-elected legislatures, not courts, have historically protected the rights of the minorities.

2006-11-09 10:32:22 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-09 10:28:10 · 19 answers · asked by General P 2

or be against it?

2006-11-09 10:27:21 · 20 answers · asked by Mr.happy 4

The information below may upset some readers but DO we really know the truth? I strongly believe that the media is prohibited from mentioning this from the government. But it does slip out on the internet as it can't be controlled.

2006-11-09 10:22:52 · 22 answers · asked by gulliblepeople 2

2006-11-09 10:20:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have some reasons but want to wait and see if anyone else has the same ideas.

2006-11-09 10:19:13 · 13 answers · asked by galacticsleigh 4

2006-11-09 10:17:26 · 16 answers · asked by Howard H 1

Do you think there will be a break between the moderate and liberal democrats? The election of 2006 brought on moderate dems, something that I'm proud of it because I'm a moderate but I know that there is Pelosi, Kennedy, and other liberals that will probably disagree with the new dems on key issues. Could this happen? Or are liberals going to be smart and move to the center permanently?

2006-11-09 10:16:34 · 6 answers · asked by cynical 6

2006-11-09 10:11:54 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are they not, historically, for small government?

2006-11-09 10:11:46 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-09 10:08:46 · 3 answers · asked by heyheyheyhey2222 1

2006-11-09 10:07:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

investigations, or will she bow to her handlers from the left, in particular, Team Soros, and allow John Conyers to pursue H. R. 635.?

Do the Dems really want bi-partisan governance?

Or will revenge and retribution rule the day?

2006-11-09 10:00:56 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-09 09:58:49 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-09 09:55:07 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061109/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_061109192421

2006-11-09 09:54:06 · 15 answers · asked by ? 6

This is not trying to bash but gather opinions. Please state your reason why you would or wouldn't support a fully Democrat government. A Dem as president, a Dem appointed majority in the Supreme Court and a Dem controlled Congress. Would you think they would need checks and balances, or do you think they would simply do a better job than any Republicans (please don't resort to insults, its just a question)

2006-11-09 09:53:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

The two most important arguments for death penalty are:

F1) It is a strong deterrent
F2) It is essential for retribution

The two most important arguments against death penalty are:
A1) It is not a good deterrent
A2) The law might be objective, but its implementation is very subjective. Once life is taken a subjective error cannot be corrected.

Sorry, I cannot include any religious arguments

I strongly agree with F1 and F2. But A2 is true. In my opinion A2 trumps both F1 and F2 - so I am against it.

Your thoughts?

2006-11-09 09:46:11 · 11 answers · asked by Existentialist_Guru 5

Which would you do?? Personally I think Chelsea needs a leash....

2006-11-09 09:45:33 · 19 answers · asked by Scotty 6

In 1994, the American people, feeling that the country had shifted too far in one direction and being fed up with it, swept the Democrats out of power in both houses of Congress. The Republicans, led by Gingrich and Dole, were given a chance to change the direction of American policy.

It seems to me that this election is very similar. The legislative and executive branches both controlled by the same party, until the people decide they've had enough and sweep the other party into power in Congress, the only major difference being that Republicans campaigned on their Contract with America in '94, while Democrats this time ran on basically nothing except disapproval with Iraq and the "time for a change" mindset.

I believe that if the incoming Dems practice the bipartisanship they're preaching about now, they could stay in power for quite a while, but if they over-reach as Gingrich and Co. did in the 90's, they'll be gone in a hurry. Your thoughts?

2006-11-09 09:42:06 · 6 answers · asked by Chris S 5

Do you think Bush talked to Powell about the Secretary of Defense job?

Why Gates? Here is an exerpt from Fox News about Gates. Is this a reason we shouldn't like Gates in the job or the is this the reason Bush picked him or both?

Gates' resume as a government policymaker is not untarnished. Critics dredged up his 1991 confirmation hearings to be CIA director as evidence he is the wrong man for the job. Then, he was criticized for missing clues about the impending fall of the Soviet Union and for politicizing Cold War intelligence. Those two complaints — misreading intelligence and using it selectively — have also dogged the Bush administration in its Iraq policy.

2006-11-09 09:37:32 · 11 answers · asked by imnogeniusbutt 4

Can you believe what an ar*e he has made of himself in the last 3 days........lol it's hilarious but also quite worrying this man is still breathing

2006-11-09 09:37:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since Congress was ours since 94 and Bush was put into office have my fellow repubs acted too arrogant on yahoo answers....before yesterday?

2006-11-09 09:35:53 · 19 answers · asked by Its me 4

2006-11-09 09:30:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-09 09:29:38 · 17 answers · asked by meg 2

They insult the heII out of you on your questions, then you go to reply to them and you inevitably see this:

(user does not allow IM)

(user does not allow email)

Freaking cowards!

2006-11-09 09:20:27 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous