English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The information below may upset some readers but DO we really know the truth? I strongly believe that the media is prohibited from mentioning this from the government. But it does slip out on the internet as it can't be controlled.

2006-11-09 10:22:52 · 22 answers · asked by gulliblepeople 2 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Dubya's puppeteers policies are not new :-

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America,

nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine

policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or

a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the

people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is

to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and

exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

The US. Government has lied about many wars. The increase of troops in Vietnam was based on an

attack in the Tonkin Gulf that never happened. Some say that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor

and let it happen to get support to join World War Two. The Spanish-American War (Remember the

Maine!) was also based on a hoax.

Not to mention the numerous covert wars that they lied about. Iran-Contra, the overthrow of

Mossadegh in Iran, Allende in Chile, Arbenz in Guatemala. Also the war in Panama, against someone

who was on the payroll of the CIA. Cuba as well. The Bay of Pigs invasion was supported by the

CIA, and the people who invaded were trained by the CIA in Guatemala.

As for 9/11 this is the origin of the plan:-
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the

nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have

seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate

influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even

believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,

characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the

world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you

will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs

(2002)

and this is what Dubya's puppeteers had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be

a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)


Which brings into question 9/11/(2001), which was never investigated properly, and has been

hijacked in order to enact Dubya's agenda and the subsequent illegitimate wars.
The 9/11 documentary Loose Change 2nd edition is available free on Youtube:-

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGEb40o17yE&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOVWBQKUpsU&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtV1uxYnu0w&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Decide for yourselves people ;)


I do agree with Dubya on one thing:-

"I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the

world saying, "We do it this way. So should you."
"I think the United States must be humble and must be proud and confident of our values, but

humble in how we treat nations that are figuring out how to chart their own course."
George W. Bush - 2nd presidential debate Oct 11th 2000

2006-11-10 04:51:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whether or not the Bush Administration was behind the attacks on 9/11, the US goverment had prior knowledge that the attacks would be carried out on the morning of 9/11 and did nothing to stop it. If my friend plans to commit murder and tells me and i do nothing i would be charged in a court of law. Why doesnt this apply to the almighty president and his cabinet members. Watch the Documentary Loose Change it explains alot.

2006-11-09 10:40:55 · answer #2 · answered by hazeallday 3 · 0 1

I wouldn't say 'just' the bush administration, but rather the people pulling their, and many other puppet government's strings.

We all lost a lot of liberty as of 9/11, throughout the entire world.

A sad day indeed.

2006-11-09 10:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Matthew. 4 · 1 0

I believe the Bush administration is behind many things, but not that.

Have you forgotten that look of bewildered stupidness Bush had on his face when he heard the news? That wasn't rehearsed - if it had been, he'd have burst into tears or something (being American).

2006-11-09 10:36:37 · answer #4 · answered by Hello Dave 6 · 1 0

I don't think Bush administration was behind the attack, but I think they knew it was gonna happen sooner or later. Maybe even on 9/11.
I guess we'll find out after many many years

2006-11-09 10:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by MVC 1 · 1 1

There's a lot that they're not telling us about that day. I firmly believe that there was no Boeing 757 that crashed into the pentagon. It's been a topic of some of my personal research. But, this was a good video to watch. If anything it makes you think. http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main

2006-11-09 10:36:32 · answer #6 · answered by Netta 3 · 1 1

Definately-It was the hatred caused by the USA Administration that led to 9/11

2006-11-09 10:25:37 · answer #7 · answered by graeme1944 5 · 2 3

how about this.How did a plane crash into the pentagon when the area is a no fly zone?Surely it would have been gunned down before reaching the pentagon.We havent heard of it since.
How come after the twin towers.we dont hear about it anymore.Better still why have we never seen any pictures of a plane wreckage amongst the debris of the twin towers?Doesnt this seem weird?I think there is a conspiracy.

2006-11-09 10:27:39 · answer #8 · answered by gavin c 1 · 1 2

I also saw the same like netta but longet it was definately an inside job

2006-11-09 10:48:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Good lord.

There are plenty of reality-based reasons to oppose Bush without making stuff up.

2006-11-09 10:34:18 · answer #10 · answered by sparky52881 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers