Other - Politics & Government - April 2007

Okay I understand that the president is not king and that this is a democracy. That is a given. However, a democracy is a system of rules. Rules that we vote on to maintain some semblance of order. Now, maybe the presidents strategy toward foreign policy has been questionable but he is the one making the rules for the next year and a half. She went to Syria to satisfy her personal issues with him, at least thats what I assume, because she couldve easily gone to him and gotten an approval. So why then, if she would do this to disrespect the office of president, should she not be charged under Logans Act?

2007-04-12 05:23:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it the left believes Conservatives are trying to strip them of their freedoms? Murder, destruction of public property, and treason are not considered "freedoms".

2007-04-12 04:31:19 · 26 answers · asked by Terrie 3

For describing Halle Berry and Barrack Obama as Halfrican Americans?

2007-04-12 03:57:48 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean as movies go it was terribly slow and predictible and drawn out. The previews were way better than the actual movie. Speaking of which Im wayyy cooler than the main character why not make a movie about me?

2007-04-12 03:55:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Sharpton is quoted as saying 'It is our feeling that this is only the beginning. We must have a broad discussion on what is permitted and not permitted in terms the airwaves'

Do you believe that it's the politicians job to determine what speech is permitted, and do you trust democrats to preserve free speech?

Who do you believe they will scilence next?

Dose the actions of the democrats remind you of goose-stepping thugs from 1920 Germany?

2007-04-12 03:46:31 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

What a freakin disaster!

2007-04-12 03:21:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I heard that Rosie went and got pregnant with Don Imus. Here, look at the baby:

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,5078680,00.jpg

2007-04-12 02:42:20 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is not a political question, so keep the answers to the question, not your political leanings...

Before 9/11, Hezbollah was the main source of terrosism. After 9/11, It was shifted to Al Quadia. My question is if we are declaring war on Terrorism, why do we not attack Hezobllah too? We know exactly where they are, and due to the fact of them being a political party too, who the top people are?

2007-04-12 01:58:52 · 10 answers · asked by Common Sense 5

Because Bushie was pandering to the black voters in N.C.?

2007-04-12 01:53:28 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Democrats want our military to invade Darfur to help stop its civil war while calling for our troops withdrawal from Iraq because its in a civil war.

2007-04-12 01:43:37 · 10 answers · asked by ? 5

collect them? I know all the police and military i have asked said they would refuse, most adding, "Who would be stupid enough to go to a house and try to remove the guns?" Will you libdiots try?

2007-04-12 01:36:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

While conveniently overlooking the fact that Power Corp has controlled four Prime Ministers Paul Martin, Jean Chrétien, Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney. As well as former Premiers of Ontario William Davis, John Robarts and former Premier of Quebec Daniel Johnson Jr.

2007-04-12 01:34:23 · 3 answers · asked by ? 5

2007-04-12 00:48:16 · 10 answers · asked by dus d 1

I think a fair amount would be a million dollars a day [each] for the length of their Suspensions.

And then pehaphs due to have the Blue Devils renamed to the Duke three.


What do you think?

2007-04-11 23:25:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-11 23:09:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am tired of the paddycake squad in the UK: your PM advised Bush (don't you remember?) after 9/11 to re-order the world because the 'pieces are in flux'. That means, you need to turn on your beloved Labour Party (yes the ones who bribe you with state benefits) to change the policy. But because you are already fitted up by the Party, you will just whinge. Pathetic.

2007-04-11 22:48:19 · 16 answers · asked by Bob M 1

i want to know that why is Usa goverment enemy of Iran?

2007-04-11 21:01:47 · 20 answers · asked by asghar 1

What cities or areas have the lowest standard of living ?

2007-04-11 20:26:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Anglos need to surrender and take Spanish language classes, like French in Quebec. The struggle for cultural dominance is over in the country of Cali; Spanish won. Venga...

2007-04-11 17:52:02 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

reading the litany of transgressions perpetrated by the democrats and i agreed with every single one of them and they are pretty bad. the best reason i can come up with that they do these things and get away with them is because they CAN!! can you blame them for walking all over the republicans when its so easy? my question is, WHEN WILL A STRONG CONSERVATIVE COME FORWARD AND LEAD THE CHARGE TO STOP THEM???

2007-04-11 17:45:10 · 10 answers · asked by afterflakes 4

Did Newt wilt? Did he sun himself too long? Is this his "out" in the presidential race? Does he not want to run? After his warm and fuzzy contact with the ideology of Kerry, the enemy, I question my support of Newt. He can befriend; he cannot cross so far over the line. He did the same thing with Hillary. What party was he from again? Does he think an end to partisanship is the way to go for his campaign? Newt, don't try to fix it, just get things done for your party. Fixing partisanship happens when things get done by an adamant president who fights for himself. Gingrich is on the wrong foot. He's not connected enough.

I support the environment, but not the stance that man is the cause of global warming. And I hate sounding apologist like the Republicans seem to be doing. He even distanced himself from Bush. Why on earth would Gingrich group hug Kerry and acknowledge global warming? Did he fail? Did he lose his backbone? What was his game? I'm so disappointed.

2007-04-11 17:44:33 · 4 answers · asked by Lana Lang 4

2007-04-11 17:23:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or was that just a conspiracy theory concocoted by Democrats in order to regain power?

2007-04-11 17:07:40 · 9 answers · asked by ? 5

2007-04-11 17:07:15 · 7 answers · asked by kenneth h 6

When prices are high, interest rate is high too, and the people are still making the same money from now to long ago.

2007-04-11 16:43:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because gas prices are going up and up and 2% people going richer and richer and 90% are going poorer and poorer.

2007-04-11 16:41:03 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

and doesn't it waste a huge amount of money, not to mention CORRUPT OUR POLITICIANS BY HAVING TO RETURN FAVORS TO LARGE CORPORATIONS????????


ISN'T THIS OBVIOUS?

2007-04-11 15:41:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just wondering.

2007-04-11 15:26:05 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-11 15:21:34 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think that any of the current candidates, from any party, can do better than 50.1% in next years elections?

2007-04-11 15:04:01 · 16 answers · asked by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5