Are You Scared that Democrats Will Use the Imus Flap to Place Limits on Free Speech?

Question

Sharpton is quoted as saying 'It is our feeling that this is only the beginning. We must have a broad discussion on what is permitted and not permitted in terms the airwaves'

Do you believe that it's the politicians job to determine what speech is permitted, and do you trust democrats to preserve free speech?

Who do you believe they will scilence next?

Dose the actions of the democrats remind you of goose-stepping thugs from 1920 Germany?

Answer 1

They only wrap them selves in the constitution when it suits them. Double standards are rampant in politics. How many Democrats have problems with restricting the second amendment???

Nothing would surprise me.

Answer 2

Loaded question, and apparently better of a diatribe than a query. we've the freedom of speech. for this reason Imus gained't bypass to reformatory for saying inspite of. though, the freedom of speech does no longer always take care of every body from getting fired. If I paintings at Walmart and tell each and each and every purchaser that i have self belief they ought to stop having childrens and dropping my tax funds, i'd have exercised my freedom of speech. although, some speech would offend adult males and women. those persons can call for that the organization hearth the guy or female, etc, once you concentration on that it may be finally the bottomline that has outcomes on a commerce' decision. If the commerce feels they'd make a lot less funds with Imus than with the help of eliminating him, he will be gone. If the organization feels they're waiting to proceed starting to be wealth, and not using a unfavorable photo detracting from that, they're going to protect Imus. that's now no longer about the freedom of speech. it may be a commerce, so the alternative shall be about what it might: funds.

Answer 3

I haven't heard anyone in government talking about limiting Imus' freedom of speech. Al Sharpton has spoken on it, but he is not elected to any office, and hardly represents the Democratic party. It is mostly a case of individuals and corporate sponsors putting pressure on Imus' bosses. The constitution does not say that a boss can't suspend an employee for offending people!

Answer 4

Wasn't the Dems or the courts that got all over Imus. He is free to say whatever he wants, that is freedom of speech. What he did say what stupid on his part and now he is paying the price. What's the problem? Say whatever you want, you have that right but there are also prices to pay. If any party has been trying to limit free speech it has been the Reps over the past 6 years. Look at all of the new FCC rules that have been enacted during the Reps control.

Answer 5

They might try. but they wont have much luck with that.
It would be nice however if someone would finally tell Sharpton to put a sock in it. He is the last person to get his knickers in a twist about somebody saying something inappropriate.

Answer 6

No, it is the Supreme Court's job to decide what speech is and is not covered by the First Amendment.

They have been very clear that hate speech is NOT covered, since its only purpose is to harm, defame, or injure others.

I don't think it can get much clearer than that, but then again, I try to be ruled by logic, and not fear and ignorance.

Answer 7

The question should be: Does one trust the resident in the White House who's running this country akin to 1930's Nazi Germany.

Answer 8

Democrats placing limits on free speech?

Wow.

Only a goose-stepping moron from the corrupt GOP would think THAT.

Answer 9

I think they will use it to send a message that no matter how high, mighty, wealthy or powerful you think you are, the "little guy" can always cut the Achilles tendon of the powerful and cripple them.

Answer 10

Yes....I think that they will....

Just like Bush used 9/11 to invade our private lives and listen in on our converstation and look at our bank records...this WILL BE USED to muffle the voices on the air...