collect them? I know all the police and military i have asked said they would refuse, most adding, "Who would be stupid enough to go to a house and try to remove the guns?" Will you libdiots try?
2007-04-12 01:36:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
As far as limiting speech, isnt that what the libslamics planning to do to talk radio and other outlets that speak out against them? Try again halfwit.
2007-04-12 01:46:15 · update #1
Let them try. But if it would come to that (it never will), I know how to use other weapons to defend myself and my home.
2007-04-12 01:40:56 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps instead of banning guns, potential owners should be forced to take an IQ test...
1. True of False, guns make great toys for kids...
Some people are very responsible with their guns, I'm sure, but not all:
Only 39% of households with children and firearms keep their gun locked, unloaded, and separated from the ammunition.
In 2004, there were 13,846 kids injured by a firearm
In 72% of unintentional deaths and injuries, suicide, and suicide attempts with a firearm of 0-19 year-olds, the firearm was stored in the residence of the victim, a relative, or a friend.
Clearly those opposed to irresponsible parents having guns (or children) are the "idiots."
2007-04-12 08:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by Ashley 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you try asking an objective question rather then point fingers at what some politician is doing?
I mean, I could make a post that says Newt Gingrich wants to regulate free speech, or for that matter, George Bush. Would that make you happy?
2007-04-12 08:42:38 · answer #3 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They wouldn't get MY guns... no way, no HOW.
I concur with Ashely that kids and guns don't mix as TOYS... I was taught at 4 (with a spanking) not to ever touch a gun without Dad there. Dad also kept the bolts and ammo separate from the rifles.
At 10 I was trained to handle a gun... on the firing range. And at 12 I went thru an NRA course on fire-arms safety.
Guns don't kill people... people kill people.
2007-04-12 09:11:55 · answer #4 · answered by mariner31 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am ashamed to say that we the sheeple who abide the law might actually willing give them up if they have their way. Look at England, Australia, and Canada, they all had major firearm confiscation and no revolt to the infringement on their ownership of firearms.
2007-04-12 08:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by True Patriot 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't get that far, the British upper classes would smash the US and make it one more colony of their empire first.
Ask a dumb question get a dumb response.
2007-04-12 08:56:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Even if they did you can always hide guns away somewhere.
2007-04-12 08:42:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will sell them to foreigners who are terrorist as a parting gift, saying "please dont kill us, we bought you a present"
Ashley- I disagree, my little brother had a water pistol and a pellet gun when he was a kiddie, and he has never had the need to shoot other people (except for the water gun) and now today he never wanted to kill anybody with a gun, in fact he has no interest in them. if anybody wanted to step to him, he would fight them with his hands not a gun.
2007-04-12 08:50:25 · answer #8 · answered by Jahpson 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
anyone comes to my house would have some problems!!haha I think you are right. I think everyone has the right to protect themselves its idiots that do it illigally that destroys everyone elses rights.
2007-04-12 08:45:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your question is almost as stupid as you are.
2007-04-12 08:44:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋