Other - Politics & Government - March 2007

2007-03-29 08:06:33 · 11 answers · asked by Miracle Mets 1

http://www.universalelectricvehicle.com/spyder.html
Specs are very good. Solar PVC system powers car.
300 miles on one charge!!!Lithium ION batteries!!
0-60 in 7 seconds!!!
Top speed 80MPH!!!
$69995.00
Charges completely in 4 hours!!!
Power everything!!! GPS!!! Air!!!
Phoenix SUT
Tesla Motor Cars
Its all coming together
Already available!!!

2007-03-29 08:03:35 · 6 answers · asked by David K 4

What do you think?

2007-03-29 07:44:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-29 07:39:11 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

When the contribute more money to republicans than democrats
http://www.buyblue.org/node/2218/view/summary

2007-03-29 07:37:40 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

To me individual right that allow destructive behavior to oneself is not a right at all. Do people forget we have support systems out there and people who will adopt? Why do people want Individual Right to abort a child, to pay a doctor to kill themselves? I mean come on now.

2007-03-29 07:32:59 · 18 answers · asked by Barack O Bankrupt 4

The I.P.C.C. (International Panel on Climate Change) is the end all source to all articles and books on Global warming. It doesn't matter if it is a Time Magazine cover article asking if it is too late to act on Global Warming or a well known movie like Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth. They all have their ultimate source as the IPCC which gave credence to the Global Warming movement.
Big problem with this as the scientists on the original panel, including MIT Professor Lindzen - who happens to be one of the most well known and according to the IPCC the most qualified person dealing with the climate states that the politicians wrote what the scientists debated about. It is all a big lie according the real scientists. Source - http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597

2007-03-29 07:25:04 · 9 answers · asked by mp95bravo 1

Would they gain or lose your business? Should corporations be involved in issues like this one?

2007-03-29 07:20:04 · 29 answers · asked by Jasmine 5

you would think the people who don't mind seeing people off themselves would fully support carnage in any type of war? i mean murder has never seemed to be an issue with Liberals... Probably explains why the vast majority of Democrats and Liberals are the average american criminal in the United States

2007-03-29 07:17:35 · 10 answers · asked by Barack O Bankrupt 4

Khalid Sheik Mohammed spoke unapologetically of the terrorist acts he had committed and those he had wished to commit.

He took responsibility for killing almost 3,000 people on Sept. 11, 2001. He said he had cut off a reporter's head, held it in his hand, and had his picture taken with it. And what was the reaction of two United States senators? They were worried that we had mistreated Khalid Sheik Mohammed in captivity.

They didn't walk out of the room and say this is a frightening example of how serious our enemies are. They worried that we were dealing too harshly with the man who had just finished saying how much he wanted to brutally slaughter us.

This inability to come to grips with evil is suicidal. Does anyone believe you can win a war being 'politically correct' or by serving tea and cookies to your enemies? Is the problem that Americans never faced such danger and are now incapable of believing in the evils of our enemies?

2007-03-29 07:17:31 · 4 answers · asked by Cherie 6

2007-03-29 06:58:25 · 18 answers · asked by Barack O Bankrupt 4

2007-03-29 06:10:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I understand that it is a struggle to have a family member with cancer, THOUSANDS of women have cancer. I understand that it must be terrible to lose a child, THOUSANDS of families have lost children. WHY IS THIS AN ISSUE? I think Edwards should stop trying to make himself seem so "special", like he is some kind of super dad/husband. Stick to the issues. There are so many others that have delt with so much more than he has. It makes him look like a dinkus.

2007-03-29 05:50:13 · 23 answers · asked by tlcbaotou 3

Because he was projected as a real American hero by the media, I suspect that Tillman's mother will be given a pass by the public. I don't think she will be demonized as some "loony leftist liberal." If she is not demonized, would that be a double standard?

2007-03-29 05:26:52 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070329/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq

The Senate is emboldening the terrorists. The Senate is giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

2007-03-29 05:19:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-29 05:14:03 · 3 answers · asked by peralesmaricela@sbcglobal.net 1

No country in the Middle East has a liberal democracy (with the possible exception of Israel), with most of the population having very limited political rights and civil liberties, especially the women.

2007-03-29 04:42:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why aren't they worried about winning the war? Talk about political motivations.

2007-03-29 04:25:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

eom

2007-03-29 03:56:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-29 03:39:58 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-29 02:28:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will he put our military at the edge? Because he wants to stay in Iraq? Is the surge working? Will it ever work in Iraq?
Shouldn't the USA be thinking more about OUR people?
Did the Congress vote on America's behalf?

2007-03-29 02:09:07 · 14 answers · asked by LIAR-KILLER 2

I have seen it said that Democrats should not receive any blame for a failure in Iraq, even if they cut funds or otherwise cripple the effort, because Bush got us into Iraq in the first place.

I hate to talk in terms of credit or blame, but it's come up, so here goes:

Imagine a doctor who, let's assume, schedules a patient for unnecessary surgery. The operation doesn't go as well as planned. A new doctor comes in and says "you botched it and we need a new approach." This new doctor then says "this is already a failure, so let's just quit" or "let's decide on a deadline - this will be over in an hour no matter what." Wouldn't Dr. #2 share some responsibility for failure?

No, my example is different because the operation doesn't cost billions of dollars, people aren't shooting at the doctors, and maybe the "patient" (Iraq) cannot, or should not be saved.

But my point is, the past is not the only consideration. I want to know what we should do NOW.

Any thoughts?

2007-03-29 01:59:05 · 7 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

The prevailing thought today from the socialists is that you should celebrate and worship the racial class you are in seeing that as some sort of achievement. They see race as an achievement. Considering you have nothing at all to do with your race selection, how could that be considered an achievement.

Multiculturalism states that culture, ideas, customs and skills are a matter of racial membership. That is in itself racism at its finest. Lets build a box, put people in it, and never let them leave or improve and move on to bigger and better things.

This states that multiculturalism, that different cultural values, are morally equivalent. In a civilized world that concept is purely ludricous. Consider female mutilation (Middle East), slavery (N. Sudan), stoning of women for adultery (Middle East). Those differences in culture are not morally equivalent to my cultural values.

2007-03-29 01:52:50 · 5 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

Could it be another 1979 jimmy carter deal!

2007-03-28 23:32:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 22:58:44 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it that when the push was on to go into Iraq everyone said it was to liberate the good people from an evil dictator (apart from the WMD lie) but with Iran people just want to nuke the entire country and see all Iranians as evil?

2007-03-28 22:35:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Its amazing this guys knuckles still dont drag on the ground.

2007-03-28 22:16:15 · 13 answers · asked by prole1984 5

another words make them quit there terrorist ways , for example - bombing ? assassination ? contaminating water supplies in there countries ? what would you do ?

2007-03-28 22:05:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 22:04:28 · 5 answers · asked by Claire 2