Why aren't they worried about winning the war? Talk about political motivations.
2007-03-29 04:25:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Not really. I'm used to their political hypocrisy, such as these firings being an outrage but Clinton firing all of them in 93 wasn't.
2007-03-29 04:28:29 · answer #1 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since 2001 the democrats have had no platform and no policy plan for the country. Its been a side show of hate for the republican party and George W. Bush. What makes me vomit is they took over the house and senate this way. They were doing everything they could do to side step the real issue, of adding a timeline to the war bill. When you know a sitting president has said for 2 years he would never sign a timeline attachment to a bill, why insert it! Now we will go through a veto! Then back to the house where there is NO CHANCE of a 2/3 majority voting in favor of over turning this! Fact is they got the minimum 218 in the house.
2007-03-29 04:36:15 · answer #2 · answered by angeline 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fake, I think not. This Administration is outrageous. They stop at nothing to push their agenda. They got caught on this one. How many have they done that they got away with so far? What makes me vomit is the mere sight of George W. Bush the incompetent, corrupt, lying, greedy, arrogant excuse for a President. I do have to laugh at how all other issues are not even thought of let alone discussed by Bush supporters. All they want to talk about is Georgie's little war and how the mean old bogeyman terrorists are right outside our door. I am not scared and I think most of America has seen the light and aren't buying the crap from the Administration any more too.
2007-03-29 05:03:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You, like most of your Republican brethren, think nothing of the attorney firings because you find nothing wrong with lying to Congress and Obstruction of Justice. You think these two felonies are nothing and yet you claimed outrage when Clinton lied to Congress about a bj.
And winning the war? The Republicans have had 4 years of complete power and have failed miserably on all accounts on this war. And we should trust you to suddenly win it now? It was a mistake from the start and has been misplanned and mismanaged by this administration at every turn. The American trust in George and his Bushies is at an end.
2007-03-29 05:11:42 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes it does. Janet Reno and Clinton did worse when they fired all of them in 1993. Also, could you imagine what the democrats would be like if Waco happened under the Bush administration? What I don't understand is how the media can be so biased in reporting the facts and completely ignore all the faults of the rats. This has been going on for years.
2007-03-29 04:34:28 · answer #5 · answered by haterade 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES."Why aren't they worried about winning the war?" They have to much invested in defeat. Worst nightmare for a Democrat now is for us to win the War.
They have no agenda and will have to spend the rest of the session on investigations. Hell, They've already hired a couple dozen lawyer firms to handle it, as well as support staff for the investigations.
Yes, it's becoming Pukesville with this congress.
2007-03-29 04:31:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Especially after one of their brighter lights, Representative Alcee Hastings (impeached/removed former Federal Judge turned felon) is being sued by Judicial Watch for FIRING the Councel to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, in VIOLATION of FEDERAL LAW because he was a Republican appointee. Hastings words were "To the victor belong the spoils". Democrats = Hypocrits. Maybe we should call them Democrits or Hypocrats??
2007-03-29 04:31:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes theres nothing political about these fireings they doing this because they hate republicans and want to get to Rove and Cheney It didnt work before it wont work now.
2007-03-29 07:40:38 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Gonzalez was using his position for GOP political gain. Democratic congressman were investingated 72% of the time and Republican congressman investigated 23% of the time. When Gonzalez suboridinates came back with nothing to bring charges on Democratic congressman he fired them. That is not ethical and I doubt it's even legal. It is an abuse of his powers and Im shocked that Gonzalez still has his job.
2007-03-29 04:30:52 · answer #9 · answered by the man 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Is there anyone left for the 'decider' to wipe out to insure his 'policies' and 'friends' are protected? Better keep our eyes open for anymore 'big brother' laws arising out of 9/11.
2007-03-29 04:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋