Do you think that it would be feasible to trust a sex offender to register on his own after being set "free"? In consideration of the crime/s commited, do they have the "right" to be trusted to keep registering after every time they move or change jobs...Do you think it would be ethical to "micro-chip" a pedophile, or do you weigh more to the offender's rights, and let him waste tons of tax-payer dollars and let the victim be failed by a corrupt paper system,(granted, I know PO's have a lot of workload to keep up with and things can get jumbled from time to time.), and let the offender get away practically scot-free if he/she does not comply with registering terms? Just think, if you can "micro-chip" your beloved pet at the local vet, to assure of his/her safety, why wouldn't you "chip" a pedophile to know where he is?
2006-08-05
16:09:05
·
42 answers
·
asked by
Bite Me
2