Government - August 2007

Or do they each have their seperate sleeping quarters. I heard both, and I just wanted to check and see which on is correct.

2007-08-02 12:37:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

and is it time we say enough of this blaming the US for everytning that comes along and pull our troops from the DMZ in Korea, (along with all the land mines) and let the South Koreans deal with the nut in the North on their own.

2007-08-02 12:24:59 · 4 answers · asked by booboo 7

Which statment best illustrates the prinicple of federalism?

a) the president has the power to veto bills
b) congress is divided into two houses
c) the supreme court has the power to review laws
d) power is divided between the states & the national government

** please reply w/ the letter of your answer **

2007-08-02 11:13:01 · 1 answers · asked by Reece 1

The infrastructure in the U.S. is declining and in disrepair (remind anyone of the levees in Katrina?) while we are spending so much on this war? Anyone want to predict what Bush will say publicly about this?

2007-08-02 10:47:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Teddy Roosevelt was indeed a leader, how do you think he would have handled the office today?

2007-08-02 10:00:43 · 12 answers · asked by Grenadine Pala 3

2007-08-02 09:29:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 08:57:03 · 23 answers · asked by smbhome 1

If you aren't in bed with the Trilateral Commission, The Bilderburgers and the CFR then you wont become president of the USA. So it basically does not matter whether or not we vote. The powers that be will put in office who ever they choose. The system is screwed. "it's time to start all over and make a new beginning...." Tracy Chapman lyrics to New Beginnings

2007-08-02 08:40:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

what are the pros and cons of these political parties:
1. monarchy
2. aristocracy
3. oligarchy
4. dictatorship

2007-08-02 08:34:58 · 5 answers · asked by austin 1

2007-08-02 08:25:36 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6

How come James Taranto is so sadly correct?

http://online.wsj.com/public/page/8_0004.html?bcpid=86195573&bclid=212338097&bctid=1130125489

2007-08-02 08:25:31 · 3 answers · asked by pacer 5

Specific agencies of interest are VA, IRS, DOJ, DOE, DOA.
If there is a gov't sight that I can utilize please let me know.

2007-08-02 06:53:49 · 2 answers · asked by Ned F 1

I need to know the Presidents of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Senate, and each of their majority and minority leaders.......THANKS!!!!!!!!

2007-08-02 06:51:45 · 7 answers · asked by Yvette S 1

see Yahoo news

2007-08-02 06:51:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or any actor for that matter? They are all full of hot air. I find it amusing that actors threaten to move and say how great other countries are, but then never move.

2007-08-02 06:43:10 · 10 answers · asked by Michael M 1

Here, you have a President of the US telling his people to ignore congressional subpoenas and Congress seems to be powerless to do anything about it. Why isn't the Bush/Cheney team being impeached, and why aren't Harriet Miers, Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales under arrest?

2007-08-02 06:39:17 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 06:16:38 · 13 answers · asked by Waxy 3

I experienced 1st hand a federal disaster--declared as such by our govt. and all this money was allotted/pledged/promised/etc for repairs. Even so, nothing has been done to prevent this from reoccuring. Many "projects" just haven't gotten done and there are those that will never get done as they deal with private property and the bulk of the disaster occured on private property--located by federal property that had something done to it that probably contributed to the private property being destroyed. I get the feeling that this happens quite often. All these monetary figures alloted for aid make the news and govt. reports and no one ever sees a dime because everything happens on private property. What do you think? No advice on getting an attorney please, just tell me what you think.

2007-08-02 05:37:07 · 7 answers · asked by BookLady 3

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19833800/

OK....no now there is a system in place that keeps tabs on what cold medicine you buy. Once you buy it, you are placed in a system that monitors how much and when you buy it...

What's next? If they can do this with medicine, what else will they use this technology for?

I guess people really WILL take whatever the government gives them....wonder if they are tracking personal lubricant to see who is getting ready for the next thing the government is going to give us.

I guess people really will let the government do whatever they want in the name of "the war on "

2007-08-02 05:24:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why hapened as well whit germany womans ? what about nuremberg about them? doesnt exist justice to that war crimes?

2007-08-02 05:16:34 · 21 answers · asked by richard q 1

2007-08-02 04:47:40 · 2 answers · asked by levon_t 1

2007-08-02 04:11:12 · 12 answers · asked by sunny 1

As a result of the incessant push towards Socialism, governments today are expected to provide more services than ever.

Whether it be welfare (both individual and corporate) or entitlements (think SS, Medicaid, and possibly UHC very soon), the push beginning in the 1930's for the government to provide for every aspect of life has begun to strain our governments, to the point of neglecting services that almost EVERYONE thinks should be provided, such as infrastructure and defense.

Should we expect more disasters such as the Minnesota bridge collapse and sending ill-equipped soliders to war in the future as the government is expected to provide more and more? Especially considering that our tax base is going to begin shrinking very soon (baby boomer retirement).

2007-08-02 04:07:25 · 2 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6

Jayalalitha is the former chief minister of tamilnadu.Mayawati is the current chief minister of Uttar Pradesh and Mamta Bannerjee is Bengal's firebrand opposition leader.

2007-08-02 03:59:42 · 13 answers · asked by chunumunu 2

http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/02/1995521.htm?section=world

WIll this gift of $100 million only finance more hatred of the United States? It is no secret that the U.S. is despised the world over, but why do we continue to give of ourselves, only to recieve hatred in return? This $100 million could have done alot within our own borders to help our fellow citizens, why give it away since our gifts have proven time and time again to do little to sway world opinion of the U.S. Makes no sense to me.

2007-08-02 02:23:46 · 4 answers · asked by theCATALYST 5

2007-08-02 01:57:27 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 01:16:57 · 9 answers · asked by Mezmarelda 6

2007-08-01 23:41:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

the upper class, middle class, and lower class

2007-08-01 23:30:29 · 4 answers · asked by revroadmoviefan 1

Are there restrictions on how much money you can take out, or anything with property or taxes? Education and health care; are they worse or better or the same? Do people still feel free? Is it harder to start a business? Easier or harder to make money? How are things there now? I visited in 1990, so a lot has happened, I'm sure.

2007-08-01 18:03:47 · 2 answers · asked by topink 6