English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

Is John McCain just trying to shift some blame onto the democrats as the republicans are pretty much circling the bowl right now? Is he trying to rile up the republican base in an effort to counter the negative effects of Woodwards book, Foley, Iraq, etc? Is he just blindly throwing haymakers hoping to land a fluke knockout punch?

2006-10-10 11:27:11 · 10 answers · asked by Michael O 2

It's a question on my government homework, thanks!

2006-10-10 11:25:10 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

or is it just easier for people to banter politically over the internet now?

2006-10-10 11:24:53 · 3 answers · asked by Jilm_Jones 3

help!can you mach them up correctly?good luck =]

A. Republican
B. Judiciary Act of 1801
C. Judiciary Acts of 1789
D. LaSalle
E. permanent alliances
F. temporary alliances
G. Spain
H. France
I. Britain
J. Federalist
K. Edmond Genet
L. Alexander Hamilton
M. Attorney General
N. Sedition Act
O. three
P. one

?'s
1. Political party that favored a strong central govn't
2. Political party that had food faith in common ppl.
3. Established a Supreme Court w/ Cheif Justice
4. Allowed President Adams to make last min. appointments of judges
5. Act passed inattempt to stop press criticism of John Adams
6. French foriegn minister whose actions added to the ruin of US neutality in was bt. France and Britain
7. Cheif US law enforcment officer
8. The country that Republicans supported during war btw. France and Britain
9.Writing/ speacking w/ intent to put the President in disrepute
10. Washington discouraged in farewell address
11.Proposed that national bank be created
if wrong let me know..

2006-10-10 10:58:52 · 9 answers · asked by what 2

Thanks!

2006-10-10 10:03:06 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why did George Washington not want political parties to form?

Help is appreciated. Thanks! =]

2006-10-10 10:01:59 · 7 answers · asked by 6

If you were not alive during his presidency, then you cant have him as a favorite.

My favorite was Bill clinton. He kept things peacfull, and safe.
America was still in good standings with the rest of the world.

2006-10-10 09:54:49 · 17 answers · asked by gotslayer 2

Not one person in my town admits to voting for Mr Bush but two years ago "everyone" was saying they were going to vote for Bush. What happened?

2006-10-10 09:41:50 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

in the military and had combat experience and the rest of them pulled connections or got deferments

2006-10-10 09:29:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ethiopian Calendar

2006-10-10 09:24:43 · 9 answers · asked by kool A 1

2006-10-10 09:15:16 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240

2006-10-10 09:07:07 · 12 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

If you think it infringes on your civil liberties,please explain how.

2006-10-10 09:05:20 · 32 answers · asked by rosbif 6

The real bosses of the world are not any more the governments, but the leaders of financial or industrial multinational groups, and opaque international institutions (IMF, World Bank, OECD, WTO, central banks). Now these leaders are not elected, in spite of the impact of their decisions on the life of the populations. The power of these organizations exercises on a global dimension, while the power of states is limited to a national dimension. Besides, the weight of the multinational companies(societies) in the financial streams exceeded for a long time that of the states. In transnational dimension, richer than states, but also main sources of financing of the political parties of any tendencies and in most of the countries, these organizations are actually above the laws and above the political power, above the democracy.

2006-10-10 08:48:19 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thank to President Bush we are all safer and stronger.

http://news.yahoo.com/fc/World/North_Korea

http://www.mnf-iraq.com/

2006-10-10 08:47:08 · 33 answers · asked by buffman316 2

Look at their corrupt leader bush, and all this terrorist action, and the government liying about 9/11 to get into iraq and get oil, lets forget about normal americans, the government is corrupt.

2006-10-10 08:21:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

If not now who or what needs to change in govern-mental circles to enable it to. Or is it time for another party to have a go.

2006-10-10 08:16:08 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

This not a racist post but I am just wondering

In 1985, Abramoff joined Citizens for America, a pro-Reagan group that helped Oliver North build support for the Nicaraguan contras. Citizens for America staged an unprecedented meeting of anti-Communist rebel leaders known as the Democratic International in Jamba, Angola. This conference included leaders of the Mujahedeen from Afghanistan, UNITA from Angola, the Contras from Nicaragua, and opposition groups from Laos. Out of this largely ceremonial conference came the International Freedom Foundation. Abramoff helped to organize, and also attended the conference.

Abramoff's membership ended on a sour note when Citizens for America's sponsor Lewis Lehrman, a former New York gubernatorial candidate, concluded that Abramoff had spent his money carelessly.
[edit]

Reagan appointment

In 1986, Abramoff was appointed by President Ronald Reagan as a member of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council.

2006-10-10 08:03:06 · 2 answers · asked by Taco 3

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=FT&Date=20061008&ID=6085419

OMG, could it be the KKK was right all along. GASP

A bleak picture of the corrosive effects of ethnic diversity has been revealed in research by Harvard University's Robert Putnam, one of the world's most influential political scientists.

His research shows that the more diverse a community is, the less likely its inhabitants are to trust anyone – from their next-door neighbour to the mayor.


This is a contentious finding in the current climate of concern about the benefits of immigration. Professor Putnam told the Financial Times he had delayed publishing his research until he could develop proposals to compensate for the negative effects of diversity, saying it "would have been irresponsible to publish without that".

The core message of the research was that, "in the presence of diversity, we hunker down", he said. "We act like turtles.

2006-10-10 07:39:45 · 9 answers · asked by Meow the cat 4

2006-10-10 07:36:49 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-10 07:36:23 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Government steps on its people so why not have people step on the flag when they enter my home.

2006-10-10 07:32:45 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

A college degree to make a living? Also, why do these same people think that our government should pay for it?

2006-10-10 07:31:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers