Waterboarding has a long history, it was used in the Spanish Inquisition.
-Regimes like the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia have used it.
-In some versions, prisoners are strapped to a board, their faces covered with cloth or cellophane, and water is poured over their mouths to stimulate drowning; in others, they are dunked head-first into water.
-The US has used it on al-Qaida suspects.
-Our present CIA Director Michael Hayden thinks the CIA should be able to use it, since they're so well trained
-Vice President Cheney said it's worth using it to save lives. He doesn't consider it torture.
-Human Rights Groups condemn it.
Now Congress is set up to fight Bush over it, since he's for it. Does the end really justify the means? If we use it, why can't other countries and regimes justify their use of it on US soldiers? Does the US want to use an interrogation technique many other countries consider torture? UK Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2223150,00.html
2007-12-08
07:52:01
·
23 answers
·
asked by
edith clarke
7
in
Politics