I am imagining an alternative legal system, which functions more like the civil courts than the criminal ones. The main difference is that charges msut be pressed by an -individual citizen-, and not by the legal system in general or any group of people. This means that each crime woudl have to have exactly one person who claims to the court that the act in question harmed them in some way. An interested party may act as a proxy when the direct victim can not speak for themselves, but would reasonably want chares pressed, such as murder. There would be three verdicts, guilty, not guilty, and undeterminable. Guilty is straightforward. Undeterminable means that innocence or guilt can not be proven either way, so no action is taken until such time as further evidence is found. Not guilty means the charges were found to be false and baseless, so the accuser is open to libel and slander charges.
There are two main functional differences to my system.
2007-11-20
06:46:25
·
5 answers
·
asked by
juicy_wishun
6
in
Law & Ethics