This week we learn that once again the EU's own hand-picked auditors refuse to sign the accounts because of 'serious discrepancies'. In other words EU bosses were once more caught with their 'snouts in the trough'. Presumably once more they will resign en-masse and, once more, re-appoint themselves! Next we hear that their daft rules mean mega-tons of perfectly edible dead fish are chucked overboard and UK fishermen are going bankrupt because those naughty Cod, Haddock, Whiting, etc. just can't recognise a Shrimp net! Only an accomplished halfwit could have dreamed up their idiotic quota rules - and only over-zealous, brain dead British public servants could be relied upon to enforce them! So what do this collection of cretins do for Britain?
2007-11-20
06:26:13
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ International Organizations
The most enthusiastic members of the EU are the net winners - who get far more out than they contribute and net losers, like the UK, get nothing out at all. We are just told by a bunch of foreigners how we must spend our own money. I have yet to hear a single valid reason why we should remain members of this totally rotten and corrupt outfit. Eventually this vile dictatorship will collapse but we can speed that day by voting for UKIP - the rest are only too happy clinging to on the euro - gravy train.
2007-11-24
07:36:45 ·
update #1
Please note that their hand picked and very generously paid auditors have NEVER signed the accounts in the whole history of the EU. That says two things to me: 1) Absolute Corruption. 2) The auditors are honourable men/women!
2007-11-25
00:44:50 ·
update #2
The EU auditors are 'hand picked' BY the EU and are 'independent'. Can someone tell me how chucking megatons of perfectly edible and valuable fish overboard conserves fish stocks? There is however a simple answer to avoiding this crazy and senseless waste - which obviously hasn't occurred to the euro-halfwits. I'll reveal all in my next posting!
2007-11-26
03:18:28 ·
update #3
The EU auditors are 'hand picked' BY the EU and are 'independent'. Can someone tell me how chucking megatons of perfectly edible and valuable fish overboard conserves fish stocks? There is however a simple answer to avoiding this crazy and senseless waste - which obviously hasn't occurred to the euro-halfwits. I'll reveal all in my next posting!
2007-11-26
03:18:29 ·
update #4
they do as little as possible while creaming off cash for themselves..
England should do as the French and only adopt policies that are advantageous to ourselves, ignoring all the rest.
unfortunately People who enter politics tend to do it for what they can scew out of the system and nothing to do with helping the rest of us.
2007-11-20 06:34:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by DogmaDeleted 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You can not have an organistation ridden with absolute corruption, when the organisation has its own auditors who you then term to be hnourable.
As for the fishing rules, it is quite simple. Over fishing has depleted fish stocks. If we ignore the fishing quota's there will be no Cod etc at all in the North Sea. Now which do you think will harm the fishing industry more?
You are right in that we need a better EU, but leaving it will harm the UK and do nothing to make the EU better. Change has to come from within. (Though sending that corrupt Crab, Mandleson there is probably not the best thing...)
2007-11-25 18:45:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Patriot 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be different - I'll try to answer the question. The EU benefits the UK (full name - lets be proper), but removing taxes and other barriers to UK trade within the EU, its largest trading partner. The benefits of removing costs associated with currency trading would also have come into effect should the UK join the Euro. It permits UK citizens the freedom to move to, visit or take up residence of any country of the EU. IT permits UK children the right to study in Universities in other EU states at rates applicable to local citizens. It permits UK citizens to avail of national health care facilities in other EU countries.
I agree the dumping of dead fish to keep within quotas is not reasonable. May I ask what you feel is the solution to bring the level of fishing under control to allow fish stocks to replenish?
I agree with the earlier author, that commented the UK should really abandon the rhetoric and separate from the EU. Then revisit the concept in a year from now. Maybe even put together a written constitution that demands the people of the UK have to agree by majority to joining. Just speaking for myself, I would really relish my trips to France, Spain, Portugal and the various islands of Europe without the masses of badly behaved "English"; I might actually be able to afford a villa if the hundreds of thousands of "eager Brits", anxious to leave the UK had to sell up as they no longer had residency entitlements in the rest of the EU.
2007-11-27 05:44:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Seán O 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The EU is not as bad as you make it out to be. Ask the Irish, the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the Greek etc and they will tell you why. The queue to join will get longer and longer and if you Brits think you are better off without it, you may quit to join the USA or wherever you wish. De Gaulle after all, was right when he vetoed your membership application for the EEC because he was well aware of your insular mentality.
2007-11-21 22:51:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Paleologus 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
UK must disassociate from the EU in order not to be involved in the corruption of the EU leaders that was discovered by the auditors.
2007-11-24 08:15:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
the best trading software http://tradingsolution.info
i have attended a lot of seminars, read counless books on forex trading and it all cost me thousands of dollars. the worst thing was i blew up my first account. after that i opened another account and the same thing happened again. i started to wonder why i couldn,t make any money in forex trading. at first i thought i knew everything about trading. finally i found that the main problem i have was i did not have the right mental in trading. as we know that psychology has great impact on our trading result. apart from psychology issue, there is another problem that we have to address. they are money management, market analysis, and entry/exit rules. to me money management is important in trading. i opened another account and start to trade profitably after i learnt from my past mistake. i don't trade emotionally anymore.
if you are serious about trading you need to address your weakness and try to fix it. no forex guru can make you Professional trader unless you want to learn from your mistake.
2014-12-18 14:49:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is run by lawyers who cannot make it in the big world so they find some little corner of officialdom were they do not have to think and then cream off the money granted by other political half wits.
2007-11-22 08:04:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What they do is extremely constructive.
They stay in Europe!.
If they came over here, they would end up in the Home Office; and there are quite enough Cretins there already.
2007-11-20 06:44:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by rogerglyn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Destination - Paradise Island!
2007-11-20 06:34:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by captbullshot 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
the french get EU subsidies for 50% effiency in there farms,the UK farmers get little
2007-11-25 10:58:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋