2007-11-20 06:25:44 · 19 answers · asked by Yea Yea 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think your numbers are a little bit off. I don't think she has even $770 million (last I heard she was around $26 million). You may want to recheck this.
EDIT: Coco-Chu...the law allowing candidates to keep the money the raised for an election campaign was changed about 10 years ago. They can no longer keep it, they have to either give it to the feds or their political party. In fact, in the 50s a law was enacted that said that candidates cannot keep the money for themselves...the had to give it to charity. That is why almost all former politicans had charitable trusts after their career was over.
2007-11-20 06:28:15 · answer #1 · answered by Downriver Dave 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
i'd quite see 10 billion money flow to practise than flow to this conflict the place hundreds of thousands upon hundreds of thousands of greenbacks are unaccounted for. If this methodology would be funded by utilising last tax loopholes and removing lots of the Bush administration classes that are valueless (like "No newborn left at the back of" and such countless others) I say decide for it. indexed under are lots of the numerous factors at the back of this software: states would be waiting to apply the money flexibly to fulfill the needs of their interior sight communities. they might serve youthful little ones; advance instructors' salaries; supply further help and preparation for instructors or work together in different events that advance and enhance their pre-ok classes. advance instructor's salaries, now there is an concept. I see that a number of you do not fee practise, perhaps because of the fact you have not experienced lots education (particularly in case you come across it demanding to construct an entire sentence).
2016-10-02 03:19:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is nuts. See the Hillary Nutcracker.
http://www.pecanworld.com/nutcracker.htm
2007-11-24 00:14:58 · answer #3 · answered by doug1kid 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhmm, she doesn't. She spends a lot on travel, advertising, salaries, etc. But what is left after the election...she gets to keep. They all do.
Almost more profitable than actually being elected president.
Almost.
2007-11-20 06:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by coca_chupa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How dare she spend all that money on her self serving campaign. She should be giving that money to the poor, less fortunate, starving children of this country. This is an outrage....there should be a cap on how much money she can spend on herself.
2007-11-20 06:32:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe 77o million.......770 billion is about what weve spent on the Iraq war....
2007-11-20 06:36:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
SHE HAS TO PAY ALL THOSE PEOPLE TO ASK HER THE RIGHT QUESTION!!!
Not very cheap to get someone in there to plant a question for her to look good.
OH, BTW, how much of that money was stolen by her from people she later claimed to have no connection to?
2007-11-20 06:33:06 · answer #7 · answered by Martin M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have you ever seen those retards on the streets with banners of their party? well, thats the lowest paid in the entire campaing. Everyone gets paid to support, to go to different cities to rally and such. Its an expensive thing
2007-11-20 06:30:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buying Rupert Murdoch is not a cheap affair
2007-11-20 07:28:51 · answer #9 · answered by scottanthonydavis 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not like her, but if that witch had that much coin, her and Bill would be living in a country that doesn't extradite to the USA.
2007-11-20 06:29:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋