Bush initially took us to war with Iraq under the alleged premise that there were WMD there. But after an extensive weapons inspection which turned up negative, Bush subsequently decreed that there "were no WMD in Iraq", an "admission" which I have to admit I thought was a little strange since Bush never admitted he was wrong, but also because there was an obvious reason why WMD may not have been found in Iraq, namely because they could simply have been previously moved OUT of Iraq and into a neighboring country (Syria, Iran, e.t.c.). I have likewise maintained since Bush's admission that the WMD could have been moved out of Iraq and into another country, while others have claimed that such a move would have been impossible to pull off undetected.
2007-11-16
11:21:39
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Other - Politics & Government