An embarrassing audio tape was made of my f and her now ex-gf in the bathroom, now the police are trying to say she was selling her marijuana when she was actually just hitting on her and showing off, but the tape would have to be played and described in order to show this. The prosecutor has produced the tape and implies that her ex-gf who has a warrant out and is hard to find consented to the tape, but parties on the tape showed an unwillingness to “come out” in the past. She believes that her ex-gf was intimidated into making the tape, because she said she was, and because they both where friends before and after the tape was made. The relationship was ended because of the tape for my f’s safety, by her bf. This takes place in Idaho (of course) and my f does not access to a lawyer because of numerous conflicts of interests. They don’t have a case, but my f thinks the tape may be used to embarrass her during trial, what evidence should my f use in a motion to suppress the tape?
2007-10-08
06:37:31
·
7 answers
·
asked by
marytormeye
4
in
Law & Ethics