English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 10 October 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

the reps and dems both accuse the other of being closed minded, but isnt it closed minded of a nation to have only 2 parties? thats a bit rigid, i mean what if you are ok with gay rights and abortion rights, but youre against raising taxes? sure, there are the libertarians, but theyre not viable. or, dare i say it, what if youre a christian socialist, like Angela Merkel of germany? or what if you have other independent ideas? the american people really arent being represented i think. both the reps and the dems should be broken up into smaller, more specific parties, so that more people can be represented. sure, not every individual can be represented, but this way would make it better.

2007-10-10 23:43:28 · 5 answers · asked by blank 1 in Politics

who will be the next PRESIDENT in PHILIPPINES this 2010 ? i need you opinion guys : ))

2007-10-10 23:36:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Well of course there is definitely more opportunity to express ourselves (and freely too) today than before. With this pro-democracy ideology spreading like wild fire everywhere. I guess the Internet is a huge factor, because it's difficult to monitor everything and also the convenience and anonymity enjoyed. This yahoo answers thing is one great example of how we all can express our opinions in so many different topics. But is it really 'free' speech? One person exercising his right to free speech may (and usually does) infringe on someone else's opinion/culture/beliefs etc. So how 'free' are we really?

2007-10-10 23:11:43 · 8 answers · asked by ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶ƃuılıǝɔ ǝɥʇ uo ƃuıɔuɐp 3 in Law & Ethics

Okay I have never had sex or for that matter even kissed a girl (or a guy since I'm not gay). Besides sexual relations, transfusions, breast feeding & all that is it possible 2 get HIV from sitting on a toilet or any other STDS? I'm pretty much a hypochondriac so i have another question. I was playing basketball earlier so I was playing with a ball that many people were touching, so I probably had a lot of germs on my hands & what not. I also shook hands with people afterward. I came home & I had 2 take a **** really bad, but I was also very constipated so when i am constipated I take a piece of toilet paper & stick it up my *** like a makeshift laxative. As disgusting as this sounds my finger may have slipped out of this shield & made skin to skin contact with my asshole. Could the germs (possibly the HIV virus) from the basketball game that were on my hands & from touching door handles be transmitted inside my *** when my finger touched it by accident? Basically can I get HIV or STDS

2007-10-10 23:11:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Lets try to be serious if we have the capacity this morning.

If in the event that we end up with Clinton's proposed heath care system AKA The National Health Care System ot Universal Healthcare System.

1) Do you honestly believe, that if you get sick, you will simply run down to the doctor's office and be seen any quicker?

2) Do you honestly believe, that the chances of being denied health care are less likely than now under this proposterous program?

3) Do you honestly believe that the Middle Class Americans are the ones who will benifit from this system?

The middle class is in big trouble folks, if this system ever goes into place. It will be us in the middle class that pay for everything. Most of us have worked hard to get where we are and aren't prepared to give it up. Our taxes are going to be an outrage if this was ever to go into effect.

Sorry my typing sucks this morning.

2007-10-10 23:08:57 · 24 answers · asked by The prophet of DOOM 5 in Politics

The talk around the U.S. is that Hillary is a respected world figure and just being elected would strengthen and heal most of our image in the world particularly Europe. Seeing as much of economics in the world today has to do with international perception of stability i am asking members of the international community to answer this question

"If Hillary is President next year how will you see your American cousins."

2007-10-10 23:05:11 · 6 answers · asked by Commodevil 3 in Politics

So you've got the power! Would you use it four your own good? Or would you abuse it?

2007-10-10 23:02:49 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

if a interfaith group of muslims christians and jews formed a small polical party to combat the true wickedness in the world i.e alchol gambling ex would u vote for them or not

2007-10-10 22:59:22 · 2 answers · asked by V-8 BLAST 1 in Politics

The WA State Govt. has worked hard to sell our minerals to China. I remember 2 years ago how they went all out to do this. Now we have a Federal Minister coming over here, Telling us that He was the one responsible for our fortune.
What a Damn Joke.

2007-10-10 22:51:55 · 3 answers · asked by Dick E knee 3 in Elections

Considering the history, and NOW.

2007-10-10 22:47:17 · 15 answers · asked by a g 2 in Politics

why do people think they need a government to tell them how to run their buisness, control taxes and where the money is spent. Decide whether our school system is working or not etc. Most of the people i know and talk to, are hard working small buisness owners that can hardly afford to hirer workers to help them so they end up doing 80% of the work themselves. Is that the true american dream? working 80+ hours a week simply because small buisness owners cant afford all the things they have to do to hire outside peoples to help out? Thus effects the job output and effects the unemployment rate. While the state is saying Walmart is ok to bring into your neighborhood but.we will tax small buisness.possibly put them out of business so they can work at walmart, further making the state and large corps richer.Im not anti capitlism.I just think the state shouldnt have control as to how we run our businesses The state seems to be fascist who suppresses our freedomsof living the american dream

2007-10-10 22:30:16 · 5 answers · asked by theoppressed25 1 in Government

How many were made?

2007-10-10 22:29:25 · 4 answers · asked by Opera Phantom 5 in Military

If the president vetoes a bill?


a. congress almost always will override the president, unless he is very popular

b. congress can override the veto if the leaders of the house and senate form a veto committee and unanimously vote to override the veto

c. the senate may override the veto with a three-fourths (3/4) vote

d. both houses must have a two-thirds (2/3) vote to override the veto

2007-10-10 22:25:03 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

I dont get it the military is for defense not offense i guees. Last time i checked the war is not football so please fill me on this issue of pro war propoganda?

2007-10-10 22:19:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

sit back and relax..they have won the War in Iraq and brought the boys home..whew..I sure am glad we got them in up there...what?..you said they didnt what?..but...they said they had a plan.....and they were going to fix everything....you mean THEY LIED?.....they have NO PLAN?...NO RESULTS EVEN?...What did we do?...and some more want in offifce TOO?....Hillary wants WHAT?.....Man oh Man...

2007-10-10 22:16:56 · 12 answers · asked by Dr Sardonicus 6 in Politics

Obviously a leader has to be intelligent, but sometimes some leaders are too 'intelligent' for their own good and it turns into cunning exploitation. Being shrewd is one thing, and being manipulative is another. That's when integrity comes into play. However if the leader is cunning in the sense that he somehow exploits others for the benefit of his own group, is this still wrong? Should a leader's integrity only apply to the people he leads?

(A leader can be a politician or a religious leader. Just leaders in general)

2007-10-10 22:09:57 · 18 answers · asked by ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶ƃuılıǝɔ ǝɥʇ uo ƃuıɔuɐp 3 in Other - Politics & Government

My older sister and her unborn baby were murdered by a well know person. There has been a warrant for his arrest and it was even on americas most wanted 9 years ago. Im her brother, now older, I want closure for my family. The detectives always tell me there gonna help but they never get to it. What can I do to push this, Im to the point were I want to go question his parents who live in California. We think he may be back in california since he fled to mexico years ago. PLEASE HELP!

2007-10-10 21:56:50 · 9 answers · asked by checkmatemortgage 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-10-10 21:50:21 · 6 answers · asked by sivaji s 1 in Government

2007-10-10 21:48:30 · 10 answers · asked by qwert 7 in Politics

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/08/another-toe-tapping-republican-caught-in-sting-ends-senate-bid/

It's weird. I'm just staying out of public restroms.

2007-10-10 21:41:13 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

execute dozens of classmates, would you immediately appoint her as ruler of the nation and then embark on a nationwide execution tour to rid all school systems of murderous problem chuildren?

2007-10-10 21:38:28 · 12 answers · asked by NONAME 1 in Politics

till they are 21? oh but lets train them to be lethal wepons right?

2007-10-10 21:35:24 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Do you think soldiers lack democratic rights? In other words, are they chickens no matter how strong they seem?

2007-10-10 21:33:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Have you had bad experiences here in the US because naturally born Americans "can tell" or "pick up" you aren't American? What has happened? Thank you. ps I am sorry if you have had a bad experience. I feel for you.

2007-10-10 21:29:54 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I have been curious to this for some time - considering that Hillary Clinton is garnering so much press, positive and negative.

If, say, Eleanor Roosevelt or Jacqueline Kennedy or Barbara Bush had decided to run for President in their times (OK, you can pretend this happened after their hubbies had ceased to be President), what would the reaction have been like? The same as Hillary is getting now? Come to think of it, would they even have been allowed to run back then...

I welcome all your thoughts and opinions on this. :)

2007-10-10 21:16:32 · 12 answers · asked by Quynh N 2 in Politics

2007-10-10 21:12:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Its a first of its kind political networking site.

2007-10-10 21:12:07 · 5 answers · asked by Pulak Barua 1 in Politics

Clinton debated the words "sex" and "is" and now Bush is debating the meaning of words like "torture" and "winning." What's the point of owning a dictionary these days?

2007-10-10 20:53:45 · 9 answers · asked by Guardian 3 in Politics

fedest.com, questions and answers