Given that:
(1) Measured in terms of income, the differences among most of us translate into factors that are temporary and/or within our control, like geography (which correlates to different costs of living), education (which correlates to delaying your income for 4-7 years), experience (which correlates again to time), occupation (which correlates to difficulty of and hours at your job)?
(2) Measured in terms of wealth, the trends are just as fluid as income but take longer to take form (people saving up over many years)?
(3) "Poor" in the US is "rich" or "middle class" in most countries and much nicer than "poor" in the US was a generation or two ago?
(4) So many of our "poor" are immigrants or 1st generation citizens which means their poverty is a function of the economic policies not of the US but of their countries of origin - indeed they came here for a better chance at escaping poverty which many seem to be realizing?
(5) The ranks of the "rich" keep growing?
2007-09-17
06:32:29
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics