And based on what exactly?
2007-09-17 06:07:09 · 16 answers · asked by BROOOOOKLYN 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
quick comment to clear things up... when he ws mayor he was not responsible for fighting crime and lowering the rate... Bill Bratton was the man with the plan and the action on that. When he tried to take his due credit, after appearing on the cover of Time magazine, he was fired by Rudy.
Moral: Do not outshine your master.
2007-09-17 06:15:57 · update #1
I feel he don't stand a chances no matter how much some people say he has clean up new york. and came to save the day on 9-11.
he is still the man who has made a mess in new york to me and a bigger mess in his personal life and if he gets a chance in the white house.
he'll make a mess there to.
base on me being a new yorker. and seeing his so call great work first hand.
PS. you don't really want this man in the white house
2007-09-17 06:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by cute as a button 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Never. If it is Giuliani vs Clinton, Clinton wins...
Giuliani is too liberal, and is virtually the same as Clinton.
Giuliani is anti gun, he is pro abortion, and pro iraq war just like Hillary. Issue for issue.
Some may try to say that giuliani isnt for universal health, then i ask you what is it when tax payers pay for abortions (which is a medical practice)? It is essentally the same.
But the bottom line is he has as little respect for the Constitution as the democrats (in general). Giuliani is trash, who is riding the fading 911 wave for all it is worth untill he lands face first on the shore which is the elections.
2007-09-17 08:27:58 · answer #2 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and he is too liberal to make it all the way throughout the primaries and take it all.
I really believe that if the choice is between Hillary and Rudy, that conservatives will not vote regardless of what they say.
If being for abortion is "sin" than the religious right will have to sit out the presidential race because whoever they vote for God will punish them according to this view about sin.
2007-09-17 07:22:31 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A department store mannikin is better than any of the Democrats who are running.
I'm voting straight Republican ticket, regardless of who the specific candidates are, regardless of what scandals are in the papers, and regardless of where the stock market is.
We cannot afford to hand our freedoms over to the authoritarian socialists who are now the Democratic Party.
2007-09-17 07:45:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Based on what, exactly, did people think that George W. Bush could be President? My problem with Guiliani is not his qualifications or his ability. It's his temperment: he tends to act like a meglomaniac bully when confronted with people who disagree with him, or when he's pushed into a corner. Hillary is the better of the two candidates.
2007-09-17 06:17:55 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we want amnesty, he'd be the one! Well, I am 110% against amnesty!
I think he srewed up when he said illegal is not a crime. He was wrong!
2007-09-17 06:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes based on the fact he was the Mayor of New York city and he did a great job fighting crime and cleaning up the city
2007-09-17 06:12:03 · answer #7 · answered by Rusty Shackelferd 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I hope not, he's a disgrace, I don't even know why he's a possibility after all of his scandals (no I'm not even refering to his private affairs)
source: Giulianiurbanlegends.com
2007-09-17 06:44:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Based that he's leading the polls in the Reps. side
2007-09-17 06:10:11 · answer #9 · answered by Con4Life 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If he can make it through the primaries
2007-09-17 07:31:58 · answer #10 · answered by secretservice 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋