Politics & Government - 12 August 2007

Just wait till she gets her peroid. She may be all anti-war and crap but she'll end up Nuking Iraq because they picked the wrong time to piss her off. Thats why I'm voting for Hillary in 2008.

2007-08-12 11:40:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Is it because Starbucks is a champion of tresured lefty causes?

Ethos bottled water.... LOL... give me a break.

2007-08-12 11:40:21 · 27 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4 in Other - Politics & Government

this is still a very consevercial question

2007-08-12 11:40:13 · 9 answers · asked by David L 1 in Military

2007-08-12 11:39:55 · 9 answers · asked by Herb G 1 in Elections

Look at elections in recent times. Jimmy Carter was a peanut farmer who nobody heard of nor cared about. My own grandfather recalled a story about being invited by a friend to meet Carter early in that Presidential race and he asked his friend "who the hell is Jimmy Carter?" and did not meet him. Carter was one of the biggest underdogs in that race. Ronald Reagan was a mediocre actor from California. George Bush Sr. was a senator and CIA director but still, he was not a celebrity. Bill Clinton was an average guy from one of the smallest and poorest states in the Union. Most people did not hear of him before and he was not popular at first. I expect to see someone besides Hillary Clinton, who more than half of Americans said they will never vote for in any circumstance, or Rudy Giuliani become President. I expect to see someone who is the rough equivalent of Mike Huckabee to win the race.

2007-08-12 11:38:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Do you think it was purely coincidental that the pill that represented the option of allowing you to once again embrace your ignorance, blithely unaware that your little world is nothing but a grand fabrication was blue, and the pill that represented seeking the truth no matter what the cost was red? Is it a coincidence that red represents conservatives and blue represents liberals?

2007-08-12 11:37:07 · 8 answers · asked by Truly Amazing 2 in Politics

I have recently been debited twice for the same holiday by a well known internet holiday company. After asking several times for a refund of half the charge which is in 4 figures, I have still not had a refund. Where do I now stand legally.

2007-08-12 11:36:03 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

my aunt passed away and left her inheirtance half to her neices and nephews and half of the estate to her brother who has also just died does here share go back into the main estate sent her estate has not been settled yet

2007-08-12 11:35:12 · 5 answers · asked by l3115r 1 in Law & Ethics

Thank you

2007-08-12 11:34:30 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

say the bail was $10,000... If you went to trial and were later found not guilty, do you get the $10,000 back?

I've always wondered this..

2007-08-12 11:34:18 · 3 answers · asked by Cara 1 in Law & Ethics

Is redeployment proving too hard on our troops? Their lives have been so disrupted and they must be very weary. Some are on their 4th tour of duty. Bush says "no draft", but why should we believe him now?

2007-08-12 11:33:09 · 4 answers · asked by ArRo 6 in Military

They say this makes him a man of integrity and moral courage.

Bush also ignored public opinion on immigration, and held to a plan to make a way for illegal immigrants to become legal. Was this another example of a moral man doing what was morally right, even in the face broad opposition?

Or did Bush have his own private agenda and his own selfish reasons for the war in Iraq and his approach to illegal immigration? Was he ignoring the American people out of his integrity and love of truth? Or something far less virtuous?

2007-08-12 11:26:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

It was my 3rd year in a Catholic high school, my friends and I decided to leave the cafeteria and go to Mcdonald's for lunch. Lunch was at twelve, we got back around 1:30pm. A teacher saw us coming in the back door, and reported us to the student affairs office, to await a punishment for the decision we made. My friends and I received detention for 3 months and something about our records, I don't recall that part, I was focusing on something else. Anyway, the punishment will begin the following year. Since, during the time we skipped lunch and some classes was after our finals and we only had 3 days left until summer vacation.

Do you think it was necessary that my friends received this punishment?

I never received the punishment, I found a way to go to college abroad early even by only finishing 3 yrs HS.

Yet, do you still think it was necessary for the punishment?

This just struck me by the way, I was just thinking and wanted to know your thoughts and if any experiences please

2007-08-12 11:25:20 · 14 answers · asked by Paul 2 in Law & Ethics

The left in its daily attacks and projection of fault to the right and to GWB who is with many falling of grace, Amnesty, Armenian genocide, Trying to deal with the left which is no deferent than the enemy we face of Islam. But the left is with them and we can not deal with the devil and they are a part of this plan. They on the left do not look in the mirror and see their lying teeth rooting away and the decay of the infected cancel that is with in them. Which we would and should call evil.

There are many names for this Narcissism, denial, and so on but the root cause is evil of itself. The degree with which it is no deferent than that of Hitler or Osama bin laden.

And when they are faced with the truth they attack and defect to profess that they are above it all that with which they have caused.

The left is pure evil. Quote from People of the lie by M. Scott Peck, MD
Evil and Sin " It is not the sins that per se that characterize evil people, rather it is the subtlety and persistence and consistency of their sins. This is because the central defect of evil is not the sin but the refusal to acknowledge it* taken from Jung as correctly ascribed evil to the failure to "meet the Shadow" ".

" If evil people cannot be defined by the illegality of their deeds or the magnitude of their sins, then how are we to define them? The answer is by the consistency of their sins. While usually subtle, their destructiveness is remarkably consistent. This is because those who have " crossed over the line" are characterized by their absolute refusal to tolerate the sense of their own sinfulness".

Ok note to the left you will not understand this but the people of the right will.

2007-08-12 11:25:16 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-08-12 11:25:02 · 4 answers · asked by john a 1 in Military

I am writing a paper and would like to use some rhetorical questions in my introduction.

Ex. "What were we fighting for?"

Thank you if you can provide some more.

2007-08-12 11:23:32 · 8 answers · asked by mscallicat 2 in Other - Politics & Government

i want to move to italy really bad but when i turn 18. And i have heard that i have family in italy i just have never met them before. So i need to know how i can move to italy and become a citizen.

2007-08-12 11:22:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

1. Tom wanted to get Rommel’s attention, so he intentionally throws a baseball at Rommel. Unfortunately, Rommel doesn’t see the ball coming, and it hits him directly in the right eye, resulting in permanent blindness in that eye. Rommel will be able to successfully claim punitive damages (as well as damages for lost wages, medical expenses, etc. ( in his lawsuit against Tom.) T/F

2. Ron & John are Partners in a small business, although they never signed a partnership agreement. Ron put up $75,000 of the start-up money, and John put up $25,000. John will also be responsible for running the business. In the first year, the business generates $200,000 in profits. To hire a manager with John’s proven skills, the business would have to pay at least $50,000 per year. Ron says he’s entitled to 75% of the profits. Result if this goes to court?

a. Ron wins 75% of the profits.
b. Ron only gets 50% of the profits.
c. John gets $50,000 salary, then Ron & John split the profits 75/25.

2007-08-12 11:20:34 · 2 answers · asked by 888 1 in Law & Ethics

Because of the diffrences between men and women and how they think and process information.

2007-08-12 11:19:20 · 16 answers · asked by docie555@yahoo.com 5 in Politics

because ive been told that the americans had it better than the Japps or the Germans but i dont believe so. so people tell me what u think

2007-08-12 11:18:24 · 8 answers · asked by David L 1 in Military

2007-08-12 11:18:03 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics

During the National era, how did the American Government Evolve from a confederation to a strong federal system?

It's a question in my summer work for school, and I'm struggling with it. Any help?

2007-08-12 11:17:58 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

haha serious but funny question

2007-08-12 11:17:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

They waited 8 mins to post it then stuck it in down the page instead of on top.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiacJH4Fy4o3BCvMCsKdqaXY7BR.?qid=20070812150501AAYge9t

2007-08-12 11:17:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

What in the world is this country comming to ?
what about the 9 youths who attacked and killed that poor man on friday night all he said was stop breaking the windows on my hired digger and the poor man who left his wife a widow and his children fatherless on christmas eve because he didnt have a ciggerette to give to another marauding gang what do you think we should do about street crime and gun crime

2007-08-12 11:15:22 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

Easy, we kill every terrorist we find; where ever he hides. That is the only way we can win. These scumbags cannot be negotiated with nor will they ever surrender. We must understand that the only way we can be victorious is to kill them all. This doesnt condone attacks on civilians like our enemies do, but a complete and entire annihlation of terrorist cells and their supporters. Many people dont want to beleive it but mass extermination of an enemy brings victory more quickly than any political agreement can.

2007-08-12 11:15:14 · 13 answers · asked by druszka717 3 in Military

... Even if everything they narrated was true.

And if they would be, who would have to prove what?

I'm just asking this out of curiosity... I love reading non-fiction books, and I have at times asked this question to myself...

2007-08-12 11:15:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-08-12 11:13:54 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I was there and all of Ron Paul supporters were there on there own and did not have to be bused in and bought. His supporters were going nuts and they had the most signs and most enthusatic supporters He did not get the most votes bought I did think he had the most real support

2007-08-12 11:12:13 · 6 answers · asked by Dave 3 in Law & Ethics

Prior to invading Iraq?
After invading Iraq?

2007-08-12 11:11:09 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics