Using broad stereotypes: Women are supposed to be better at multi-tasking, while men are supposed to be more goal-oriented. Each of these is its own kind of strength, but I'm hoping a female president might be better at balancing domestic and international issues because of it. Also, women are far less likely to rush off into war. I can't argue with that, either.
Certainly, if you named the top rulers of all of English history, Victoria and Elizabeth I rank highly. I'm pretty sure an American woman could do as well.
2007-08-12 11:23:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
If you're expecting Hillary to be that female President, you shouldn't expect too much of a change in perception. She is a consummate politician, and has no interest in making waves or changes in the interests of the American people. She will do as her party leaders order her to do, just as all the other cowardly politicians have done over decades.
Hillary is not a warm-and-fuzzy female; she's a cold, hard-hearted politician without regard for voters or citizens. -RKO- 08/12/07
2007-08-12 18:28:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
A perception without p*nis envy.
2007-08-12 18:51:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Danger.
Any Female may Nuke the World, when on their period.
You know that!!!
In Hillary's case, we don't have to worry about that.
Because Hillary is NOT a female!
She is much more Male that the Muslim Obama, or the "Little Sissy Breck Girl", Johnny Edwards, who hides behing his wife's large skirt.
GO HILLARY!!!!!!
2007-08-12 18:27:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by wolf 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
If you think it takes having a female president for people to realize that men and women don't think the same way, you don't have much perception.
2007-08-12 18:24:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by open4one 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Hillary is no better than Bush. She is dishonest and very unfriendly. One senator walked up to her to shake her hand and to meet her on the first day on his job, and she looked at him and kept walking right by him.
And I doubt Hillary will be our President very much. I expect to see a person who we don't hear too much about to be the top candidate in the future. This has happened in the majority of Presidential elections in recent years.
2007-08-12 18:25:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Under a woman's leadership we will have a kinder, gentler nation. That is not to be confused with weak or stupid. There will not be so much aggression but there will be more successful negotiations
2007-08-12 18:32:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Depends on the female really. A good change if it was Condi. A horrible and disastrous change it was Hillary. Thank God she'll never get elected!!!
2007-08-12 18:27:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
don't think its going to happen but would be interesting to see how the middle east leaders would react to having to negotiate with a women considering they have 0 respect for women in their culture
2007-08-12 18:24:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by REAGAN REPUBLICAN 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I've seen many women leaders and sometimes their think pattern is no different than a man. We won't know since we will not be seeing a woman president this time around.
2007-08-12 18:26:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋