Politics & Government - 2 March 2007

2007-03-02 06:24:23 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Cons like to bring up the fact that the Bible states that homosexuality is wrong, and use that as an argument against it.

The Bible also states that it is a sin to interact with a menstruating woman (Leviticus 15). We all commit this sin on a daily basis.

Why is it okay to ignore that instruction of the Bible and not others?

2007-03-02 06:24:17 · 24 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics

And why Bush send our troops to fight for them?

2007-03-02 06:23:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Hi i am currently in Canada and im a uk citizen.my status at present is visitor and seeking work.I called the immigration in toronto and they told me that i need a job offer before i can apply for my work permit.I have no trades but i have background experience.I have called companies and getting nothing and very hard to get resources for my situation,i need too know if there is anyone out there that has been through this and accomplished the issue or anyone that has any idea what i can do that i havent already done? ty

2007-03-02 06:22:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Do they think there is no record of what Bush said about WMD on the eve of the war?

Do they think people like Kofi Annan don't know anything about international law?

2007-03-02 06:21:38 · 27 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics

I read somewhere that 78% of all statistics are all made up.

I mean, I heard it, so it must be true.

Right?

2007-03-02 06:21:33 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

"I believe that George Bush is surrounded by some of the most scheming, devious, ruthless men to have found their way into government since the days of the Borgias. I believe that they were criminally negligent in failing to respond to intelligence about a potential attack by al-Qaida, and that they have sought to disguise their incompetence by classifying crucial documents."

"I believe, too, that the Bush government seized the opportunity provided by the attacks to pursue a longstanding plan to invade Iraq and reshape the Middle East, knowing full well that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. Bush deliberately misled the American people about the links between 9/11 and Iraq and about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. He is responsible for the murder of many tens of thousands of Iraqis."
George Monbiot, Tuesday February 20, 2007

2007-03-02 06:20:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Because he attends the United Church of Christ in Chicago?

The United Church of Christ is not to be confused with the "Church of Christ." The United Church of Christ, however, supports homosexual marriage, abortion, environmental justice, globalism, the International Criminal Court, the Palestinian movement and believes that Israel is illegally occupying the covenant land. The UCC seems to conveniently justify and legitimize his beliefs that social progressivism is equal to Christ and he writes in his memoirs that his own salvation was not an "epiphany." He reasoned after his daughter asked about life after death, "I wasn't sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang."

2007-03-02 06:20:22 · 9 answers · asked by lankford01102 2 in Politics

Hello I'm From Syria..Live And Work In Saudi Arabia
I Want To Be A Freemason But There Is No Lodge There
In Syria Or In Saudi
I Ask So Many Brothers About That , Most Of Them Tell me I Have To Go To A Country That Has A Lodge
I Wanna Ask: Would You Please Tell What Can I Do , I Had Now One Year Trying To Join
Please Can I Do That On Internet ?

2007-03-02 06:18:43 · 10 answers · asked by elvis_only1979 1 in Other - Politics & Government

My assumption is that it would force the automobile industry, both foreign and domestic, to make vehicles of those class more fuel efficient. It would seem that this would lower America's dependence on foreign oil, but are there other rewards or consequences of enforcing such standards on the industry?

2007-03-02 06:18:40 · 2 answers · asked by Wee Bit Naughty 3 in Government

The discovery channel has a special on Sunday night.

They have supposedly found the bones of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdelin, all buried in a crypt together. What impact will this have on the religiuos community?

2007-03-02 06:18:18 · 18 answers · asked by snowball45830 5 in Politics

2007-03-02 06:17:18 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

2007-03-02 06:16:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I LEFT MY JOB DUE TO HEALTH REASONS AND I AM NOW WORKING MY LAST CHECK WOULD OF HAD 1 WEEK PAY AND 24 HOURS VACATION ON IT. I DID CALL THE BOOKKEEPER THAT DOES THE PAYROLL AND SHE VERIFED THAT SHE MADE A CHECK FOR ME FOR 1 WEEK AND 24 HOURS OF VACATION AND GAVE IT TO THE OWNER. MY W2 AND MY LAST PAYCHECK IS ABOUT 700.00 DIFFERENT. WHAT DO I DO TO GET THIS MONEY OR AM I JUST OUT OF THIS MONEY??

2007-03-02 06:15:58 · 6 answers · asked by Patty P 1 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-02 06:15:31 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-03-02 06:15:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

It seems that all these free-trade agreements and tax cuts are designed to hurt the middle class. Does anyone care about the workers? Will we proove marx right when the upper class moves to high and the middle becomes the bottom? thoughts?

2007-03-02 06:14:56 · 16 answers · asked by Woody 2 in Politics

2007-03-02 06:14:11 · 3 answers · asked by jeffnjen73@sbcglobal.net 1 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-02 06:14:11 · 6 answers · asked by farshadowman 3 in Law & Ethics

Bush lying about WMD...plus...The United Nations charter has a provision which was agreed to by the United States formulated by the United States in fact, after World War II. It says that from now on, no nation can use armed force without the permission of the U.N. Security Council. They can use force in connection with self-defense, but a country can't use force in anticipation of self-defense. Regarding Iraq, the last Security Council resolution essentially said, 'Look, send the weapons inspectors out to Iraq, have them come back and tell us what they've found -- then we'll figure out what we're going to do. The U.S. was impatient, and decided to invade Iraq -- which was all pre-arranged of course. So, the United States went to war, in violation of the charter.

2007-03-02 06:12:05 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-03-02 06:10:38 · 22 answers · asked by Nader 06 *UAE spirit* 2 in Military

i worked at a clothing store for alomost 2 yrs but then i left to go and get married and moved away i had my mail forward to me and i still have not recieved my w2 form for my taxes i even called my old boss and she gives me the run around she said there is sumthing wrong with the mail and that she infact took a long time to recieve it but she did get it at least she keeps tellin me to wait a week i keep doin so it has been a month and still nothin is there a number to call also could it be because i have a new last name what do i do????

2007-03-02 06:10:08 · 5 answers · asked by Claudia H 1 in Law & Ethics

I hate to betray family, but there is a $100,000 reward for his where-abouts and he is in my basement as we speak!

2007-03-02 06:09:40 · 6 answers · asked by Mullet Man 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-02 06:09:26 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Is this what Jesus meant? Why do liberals suddenly become Bible scholars when they feel like tripping a conservative? Are we not to protect those "being led away to slaughter", and, "no man hath greater love than this, that he lay down his life for a friend"? If a man threatens my friends and family and has a track record of backing his threats with action, should I not defend them?

2007-03-02 06:08:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-03-02 06:08:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Plus...

The United Nations charter has a provision which was agreed to by the United States formulated by the United States in fact, after World War II. It says that from now on, no nation can use armed force without the permission of the U.N. Security Council. They can use force in connection with self-defense, but a country can't use force in anticipation of self-defense. Regarding Iraq, the last Security Council resolution essentially said, 'Look, send the weapons inspectors out to Iraq, have them come back and tell us what they've found -- then we'll figure out what we're going to do. The U.S. was impatient, and decided to invade Iraq -- which was all pre-arranged of course. So, the United States went to war, in violation of the charter.

2007-03-02 06:08:00 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-03-02 06:07:22 · 17 answers · asked by indiananytime 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-03-02 06:04:53 · 17 answers · asked by Annie 5 in Other - Politics & Government

make good politicians? Jimmy Carter springs to mind - and also that ficticious Mrs. something played by Jane Horrocks.

2007-03-02 06:04:12 · 11 answers · asked by Cream tea 4 in Politics