English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 3 July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

I would love to be able to vote for someone that I thought was intelligent, ethical and experienced but that never seems to be an option. Wouldn't anyone else vote based on this? If not why do people vote for candidates that obviously have none of these qualities (Republicans and Democrats). Is it one issue? what issue? Is it something else... what?

2006-07-03 08:43:27 · 9 answers · asked by bigred1612 2 in Politics

2006-07-03 08:42:58 · 6 answers · asked by Fawzi 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-07-03 08:42:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

I personally think that he overstated the severity of the problem.

By the way.......The reason the plan was shot down is that the numbers he was using were misleading. He talked about "an 11 trillion dollar SSI deficit". The problem was that the number was reached by stretching the math into the year INFINITY (yes, that is true. you can research this yourself).

2006-07-03 08:42:46 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-07-03 08:41:47 · 1 answers · asked by Fawzi 1 in Law & Ethics

They have weapons of mass destruction, It would create a better economy (War brings jobs) and they have tyrants for leaders well so do we but why not invade moscow, and beijing than we really will be the superpower.

2006-07-03 08:37:22 · 12 answers · asked by JOHN T 1 in Politics

If you type in your home address (US only) It will show you a satellite pic of the house, how much is it valued at, square footage, how much your taxes are etc. Does it worry you that all that information is so easily available??

2006-07-03 08:37:12 · 7 answers · asked by Flyhigh100 1 in Law & Ethics

They have weapons of mass destruction, It would create a better economy (War brings jobs) and they have tyrants for leaders well so do we but why not invade moscow, and beijing than we really will be the superpower.

2006-07-03 08:36:38 · 11 answers · asked by JOHN T 1 in Military

just frustrated that our fuel prices are so high and I am wondering what purpose NASA has for attempting to send the shuttle up and every day it is delayed it costs 1 million per day

2006-07-03 08:28:16 · 12 answers · asked by Annefro 1 in Other - Politics & Government

I need to file a divorce as soon as possible, I live in Wichita Kansas and am trying to divorce abusive husband, I am not able to pay for an Attorney at this point in time but I need to do this ASAP, so where do I go from here?

2006-07-03 08:27:13 · 6 answers · asked by Chevelle 1 in Law & Ethics

Once and for all, to all you individuals that want Bush impeached. Based on the Constitution, which is the only guide for this action that there is, what are the "high crimes and misdemeanours" that Bush has committed.

Don't tell me anything about lying to anyone. Lying in and of itself is not a crime. You will say Clinton was impeached for it. Yes, he was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury which is a legal crime for which he was convicted and sentenced prior to his impeachment.

Don't tell me anything about an illegal war anywhere because Congress gave him the power to go to war after 9/11, against all terrorism. In that act they also gave him the power to have all the necessary means to fight that war.

So already barring anything related to those two areas what "high crimes and misdemeanours" has Bush committed while in office?

Pleaase bring forth all your proof for the trial as this is the time of discovery!!!!

2006-07-03 08:23:33 · 17 answers · asked by rhutson 4 in Other - Politics & Government

Maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture but most of the people I know who are immigrants have large families and don't seem to be concerned about how many babies they bring into the world. Is this true? If so, is there a reason for it? Is this a big, medium, little or no problem at all for the USA ...or even the world? Gobal warming and all that? More people ....more warming?

2006-07-03 08:23:27 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Strictly speaking, a liberal supports reform and a progressive society... If applied inteligently isn't this a good thing?

2006-07-03 08:19:46 · 16 answers · asked by bigred1612 2 in Politics

Statistics overwhelmingly show that states with high gun ownership, and in particular, the easy ability to obtain concealed carry permits, have lower crime rates. Still, our politicians think they can "save" us by restricting our access to guns. Without being too cliche, that leaves the law-abiders defenseless against the bad guys, who still have guns.

I'm from The People's Republic of California. We have some of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation, and they do nothing. Crime continues to out-pace the rest of the nation. I can cross the border into Nevada and obtain an out-of-state concealed carry permit. Many, many states have similar laws.

Yet "the people" continue to vote for politicians that propose more restrictive gun laws, statistics be damned.

What would be an effective means for educating the people AND our politicians that less restrictive gun laws lead to more law and order?

2006-07-03 08:18:21 · 5 answers · asked by theothermikes 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

These people will never be under attack in there state because there is nothing there to blow up and yet where the attacks take place like NY people think Bush is doing a bad job at keeping us safe. Who are you going to listen to?

2006-07-03 08:18:00 · 10 answers · asked by DEEJay 4 in Politics

from what i remembered france vetoed the resolution of in vading iraq so why did the u.n. just let the us led coalition do what they want to do???

2006-07-03 08:10:51 · 14 answers · asked by chock d. 2 in Politics

2006-07-03 08:08:32 · 8 answers · asked by John L 1 in Law & Ethics

Like most vetrans who saw much action he didn't say much. Dad, A Lt. Col. was a member of Third Army,8th corps, AntiAircraft, his insignas were the circled A and crossed motars. I suspect the honours could be for: being part of the organization leading up to the landing at Normandy, actions at Normandy. Liberating Oldorf Nord, Dad was there for 4-6 weeks including Ike's tour.He establised and mantained the copper communication lines into and out of Bastogne. However I don't know anything for certian, like I said Dad didn't talk about his medals. One of his immidiate commanders was Col. Wolf. After Normandy Dad's unit(8th corps) basically followed the Rine intil the Buldge when it was destroyed as a unit.(The 8th's listed on the memorial on the hill over looking the battlefield, the family visited it in 72'). At the end of the war he was stationed very near "Stalin's" troops.

I have sent for his records, however the pentagon tells me they were lost in a fire. Any ideas out there?

2006-07-03 08:02:03 · 5 answers · asked by Jane B 3 in Military

I read that statistics show that drunk drivers cause less accidents than people on cell phones do. Is there anything that is really THAT pressing that you cant wait until your car is parked? Is there anyone out there who has not had a close call because of a driver on the phone? Have a look at this list of countries that have and have not banned cell phones while driving. Buckle your seat belt and hang up the damn phone!
http://www.cellular-news.com/car_bans/

2006-07-03 08:01:31 · 7 answers · asked by Flyhigh100 1 in Law & Ethics

How about Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy or Howard Dean if they were president?
(P.S. I am NOT conservative or liberal; I am sensible! Please do not start by bashimg meas conservative or liberal)

2006-07-03 08:00:45 · 23 answers · asked by dude 4 in Politics

2006-07-03 07:59:09 · 12 answers · asked by ZEUS! 1 in Military

fedest.com, questions and answers