Politics & Government - 2 July 2006

Don't get me wrong, I love Yahoo!. But they refuse to remove the categories listed below from their Yahoo Member Directory. I have reported the categories to Yahoo!, but they refuse to remove them.
In these categories, there are thousands of members who have listed on their profiles their "interests" or "hobbies" to being "viewing child/teen porn".
Podofilia
http://br.members.yahoo.com/interests/po...
Jump Little Children
Strangers With Candy
Cherry Poppin' Daddies
Cream Pies
Ol' Dirty Bastard
Trick Daddy
Picture_Trading
PonyBoys_and_Girls
No_Limit
Innosense
Kinki_Kids
Student Bodies
Older Men for Younger Women
Jerky Boys
Never Been Kissed
Girls@Play
Erotic Cartoons
Swing Kids

And these are not all. There are many more, only I can't list them all here.

For those who will say, "It is a free country";
I always feel they must like child porn, and they are trying to protect these perverts.
But child porn is not a "freedom".
CHILD PORN IS ILLEGAL!

2006-07-02 03:11:23 · 27 answers · asked by Barb 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-07-02 03:09:34 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

With multiple countries involved in the middle east, it seems the USA is calling all the shots on prisoner treatment. What about the opinion of other countries who are also losing soldiers in the war?

2006-07-02 03:09:17 · 6 answers · asked by corvette 6 in Law & Ethics

That would be a fully computerized sniper gun that could all by itself identify targets, zoom in, aim, engage, shoot and hit all without any human intervention.

Does such a weapon exist ?

2006-07-02 03:07:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Recent supreme court ruling gives terrorists the same "rights" that Americans have in a court of law.
What do you think??

2006-07-02 03:05:08 · 14 answers · asked by corvette 6 in Law & Ethics

George W. Bush plumbed the deepest place in himself, looking for a simple expression of what the assaults of September 11 required. It was his role to lead the nation, and the very world. The President, at a moment of crisis, defines the communal response. A few days after the assault, George W. Bush did this. Speaking spontaneously, without the aid of advisers or speechwriters, he put a word on the new American purpose that both shaped it and gave it meaning. "This crusade," he said, "this war on terrorism."





Crusade. I remember a momentary feeling of vertigo at the President's use of that word, the outrageous ineptitude of it. The vertigo lifted, and what I felt then was fear, sensing not ineptitude but exactitude. My thoughts went to the elusive Osama bin Laden, how pleased he must have been, Bush already reading from his script. I am a Roman Catholic with a feeling for history, and strong regrets, therefore, over what went wrong in my own tradition once the Crusades were launched. Contrary to schoolboy romances, Hollywood fantasies and the nostalgia of royalty, the Crusades were a set of world-historic crimes. I hear the word with a third ear, alert to its dangers, and I see through its legends to its warnings. For example, in Iraq "insurgents" have lately shocked the world by decapitating hostages, turning the most taboo of acts into a military tactic. But a thousand years ago, Latin crusaders used the severed heads of Muslim fighters as missiles, catapulting them over the fortified walls of cities under siege. Taboos fall in total war, whether crusade or jihad.

For George W. Bush, crusade was an offhand reference. But all the more powerfully for that, it was an accidental probing of unintended but nevertheless real meaning. That the President used the word inadvertently suggests how it expressed his exact truth, an unmasking of his most deeply felt purpose. Crusade, he said. Later, his embarrassed aides suggested that he had meant to use the word only as a synonym for struggle, but Bush's own syntax belied that. He defined crusade as war. Even offhandedly, he had said exactly what he meant.

2006-07-02 02:58:21 · 3 answers · asked by Hoolahoop 3 in Politics

Would they unfairly lock up the innocent guy, or let the crazy one walk the streets? Would the non killing twin get a cut sentance for being a witness?

2006-07-02 02:56:45 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I am involved with the UK Government in transport industry specialising in the environment and reducing carbon from UK fleets.

With my family we want to emmigrate to Australia or the USA and need to get a VISA sponsered job. I am willing to adapt to many kinds of jobs but mainly selling and Marketing but do have good management experience.

I would value some help in this, most web sites want to charge loads of money with no guarantee of sucess, I am willing to speak to anyone about this to explore options

I am 47 years of age with a good CV.

Thanks

A

2006-07-02 02:55:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-07-02 02:54:32 · 5 answers · asked by afrisco4 1 in Civic Participation

2006-07-02 02:53:45 · 7 answers · asked by Julie B 1 in Law & Ethics

Why don't you care everythings???

2006-07-02 02:53:40 · 14 answers · asked by JAMES 4 in Law Enforcement & Police

I want to help sponsor a child who is in most need of help? Please advise of a legitimate charity! I want to make sure the child or children are really receiving help from my donations.

2006-07-02 02:49:50 · 14 answers · asked by Lou 2 in Embassies & Consulates

I was 13 when I got introuble, I haven't been in trouble since, or before that, when I turn 18 will it be expunged? I heard that felonies stay forever but then I've heard everythings erased when you're 18.

2006-07-02 02:48:19 · 12 answers · asked by Jenn 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-07-02 02:47:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-07-02 02:43:14 · 5 answers · asked by US and BUSH work together. 1 in Civic Participation

Explanation and background:
This is an extreme measure and open to suggestions. A lot of people think that individuals with AIDS are responsible enough to not have unprotected sex. I've even read forums of people who are mad that they have AIDS, and wish to spread it to everyone they can. I’ve even heard a story from a family member who worked in an AIDS clinic. A patient told him that he had a one-night stand with a woman who didn’t have a hotel room after a delayed plane. They went partying late into the night, and then came back to the hotel room and had sex. The next day, the man woke up, and the girl was gone. While he was peeing, he looked into the mirror and saw, written in lipstick, “Welcome to the wonderful world of AIDS”...pretty scary story!

Possible Solution:
If you don't have AIDS you are required to get a yearly AIDS check. If you have AIDS you are required to get a non-visible (with clothes on) tattoo on your lower stomach to warn your partner. The tattoo is *required*.

2006-07-02 02:38:00 · 9 answers · asked by Derek 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-07-02 02:26:38 · 3 answers · asked by Faculty Rights Coalition 1 in Law & Ethics

Do you think he will pretend that that is the first time in his life to have seen a monkey

2006-07-02 02:25:13 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

If the goverment, nor scientists, were and are not certain when a "fetus", (unborn child) is a "living human", then should the federal goverment avoid any involment in the topic and procedure? Shouldn't the goverment have, perhaps, allowed private abortion clinics and refused federal funding, since they were and are not certain when an unborn child is living?

Also, since abortion often and very much offends the religeous, is it Constitutional to force the religious to financialy support a procedure that contradicts their belief? For instance, should Christians be forced to financially support, (through taxes) federal abortions when they are religiously against the procedure?

Isn't it hypocritical for civil-rights activists, (pro-choicers, feminists) to fervantly defend the "rights of women" while violating the rights of the religious? Shouldn't these activists be against federal funding of abortions, which violate the rights of the religious?

2006-07-02 02:21:16 · 3 answers · asked by man_id_unknown 4 in Other - Politics & Government

They're here now, so why not go ahead and make taxpaying citizens out of them?

2006-07-02 02:20:49 · 14 answers · asked by Professor Chaos386 4 in Other - Politics & Government

Answers other than "Grasshoppers and wasps smeared over the earth sucking the nectar." please

2006-07-02 02:18:28 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

are you in?

2006-07-02 02:10:29 · 10 answers · asked by cjone782000 2 in Civic Participation

2006-07-02 02:09:49 · 12 answers · asked by toe poe gee gee oh 5 in Law & Ethics

International Intellegence services are getting mad who to follow.Despite the fact that there an international agreement for fighting crime some countries went beyound international rules in violating personal freedom in the name of fighting terrorism.What they are talking to the international community and what they are practicaly doing is incompatable Why?

2006-07-02 02:05:31 · 12 answers · asked by Blue Nile 1 in Government

i believe bin laden last day is soon. he is scare to appear in tap so he dose not face the same end his friend had.

2006-07-02 02:02:31 · 10 answers · asked by TT.huntre 1 in Other - Politics & Government

most poeple say that Binladin is in pakistan/Afghan borders but a survey was done in Dubai and half of the people said that he is sitting in USA and enjoying....... let me ask you guys... WHERE IS BIN LADIN?

2006-07-02 02:00:56 · 55 answers · asked by Born_yesterday 3 in Politics

2006-07-02 02:00:10 · 6 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-07-02 01:53:45 · 20 answers · asked by mariodw26 1 in Politics

2006-07-02 01:48:30 · 6 answers · asked by ladyghost19 3 in Law & Ethics

were they protestant?

2006-07-02 01:47:44 · 8 answers · asked by Airon P 1 in Immigration