Politics & Government - 27 June 2006

Ive always been told U.S. funded them mostly.

2006-06-27 19:11:01 · 16 answers · asked by simo9352 5 in Politics

Should it be legal, do you think it is more safe than alcholo, and do you t hink it will be legal in out life time?

2006-06-27 19:04:25 · 24 answers · asked by eeyore_0816 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-27 19:02:18 · 23 answers · asked by Bryan G 2 in Military

2006-06-27 19:02:13 · 11 answers · asked by ijibeit255 1 in Military

just in time for the November Mid-term elections? what say you?

2006-06-27 19:01:29 · 4 answers · asked by Pie's_Guy 6 in Politics

2006-06-27 19:01:05 · 6 answers · asked by King Midas 6 in Politics

i heard about it on Fox News...
Tuesday, June 27:
• A Planned Parenthood probe! Is the group making money talking teens into abortions?!

2006-06-27 19:00:34 · 14 answers · asked by vanessa 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-27 18:59:16 · 14 answers · asked by King Midas 6 in Law & Ethics

some papers i had to get a notary to sign,were signed and sealed by someone other than the notary.the name is a woman but it was a man that signed and stamped the seal.

2006-06-27 18:59:08 · 5 answers · asked by Jessica K 2 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-27 18:54:22 · 25 answers · asked by Smokie 1 in Law & Ethics

I know Katrina happened a year ago but this question plagues me everyday. The media also played a huge role in calling US citizens "refugees". Did they not understand the meaning of refugees or only called the US citizens this because of the color of their skin? Let me hear those answers!

2006-06-27 18:48:38 · 20 answers · asked by curiousbf 1 in Government

im torn between joining the navy or the airforce what should i do what brancher have what benefits? In the navy are you cooped up on a ship for long periods of time? What is the airforce like?

2006-06-27 18:48:38 · 25 answers · asked by jwehrly2000 2 in Military

well?

2006-06-27 18:48:27 · 15 answers · asked by gndmalx 3 in Military

I have to think the oil in Iraq had more to do with the war than a terrorist threat. After all, all sensible, informed people know that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11...but we also know that Bush and all his oil industry buddies are getting rich now...

2006-06-27 18:46:50 · 16 answers · asked by jan2boys 2 in Politics

Did the erection dysfunctional talk show host have a gay time on the island of Hispaniola?

What's the scoop, did he sneak away with his closeted "ann-ti-femi-nazi" godless counterpart again?

This probe is for confidential purposes only.

Don't miss the continuing satirical series, "The Blowhard Drug Addict and the Bleached Blond Harridan"

2006-06-27 18:46:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

in his speech he says mexico first foreiners second and no borders . isnt that racist? when we say America first they say that we are racist . and one of the runners that is leading in polls is very anti American yet he wants no borders to keep his voters there ?

2006-06-27 18:44:25 · 11 answers · asked by 99 3 in Immigration

I'm 24 years old, and I really don't want to have to shoot anyone. I don't have a high school diploma, only a GED. That most likely disqualifies me from the Airforce, and the Coast Guard. They accept them but rarely from what I have gathered. I have looked at the Army as a last resort throughout my life. Even though I know that I would do very well within it. I want to be in a intelligence or medical MOS since it would help me when I'm done with my term. I want to know if there is any way to go active, but not be in a combat deployable position? I'm just trying to make sure I make a wise decision and not a foolish one to my own personal morals. I want to join, but love my job... not hate it.

2006-06-27 18:39:21 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-06-27 18:37:53 · 22 answers · asked by polo 1 in Politics

2006-06-27 18:35:40 · 11 answers · asked by sandy 1 in Immigration

I have read many opinions from both sides of the Israel-palistinian conflict. It seems that many are just based on emotions and not on actual understanding of the conflict. Many see the palistineans as the underdog whos land was taken so they side with them. Others see the Israel's as the just nation since they don't attack without instigation and are a democratic country. Based on these initial emotions people form staunch opinions about who is right. If the average person spent even 1 hour doing actuall historical research using non-biased sources they would understand that the conflict is not that simple either way. Though truthfully through actual research of my own I have come to side with the Israels. This is because the actual historical facts seem to end up on the side of Israel. Mabye I'm wrong and mabye I'm right, thats not my point.What i am asking is why can't people just do some research before forming a political opinion. Is it really that difficult?

2006-06-27 18:35:29 · 14 answers · asked by E M 2 in Politics

it is anyway said in the constitution the seperation of the church and the state should be observed or exercise....

2006-06-27 18:34:47 · 4 answers · asked by Dionisio M 1 in Government

It seems as if everyone hates Bush these days... What's your take?

In my opinion it is the media...

2006-06-27 18:31:15 · 20 answers · asked by (NO) NAME 5 in Politics

There is an abundance of compelling scientific evidence which contradicts the official explanation of the events on September 11, 2001 to an astounding degree. Namely theories by Jeff King, a physicist from MIT and Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young University. Why has key evidence been completely ignored? Was the 9-11 Commission a massive cover-up?

2006-06-27 18:27:45 · 6 answers · asked by IDoTVAds 1 in Government

mexico, president, 2006

2006-06-27 18:24:51 · 12 answers · asked by javier c 1 in Government

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
— No liberal cause is defended with more dishonesty than abortion. No matter what else they pretend to care about from time to time — undermining national security, aiding terrorists, oppressing the middle class, freeing violent criminals — the single most important item on the Democrats' agenda is abortion. Indeed, abortion is the one issue the Democratic Party is willing to go to war over — except in the Muslim world, which is jam-packed with prohibitions on abortion, but going to war against a Muslim nation might also serve America's national security objectives. Liberals don't care about women. They care about destroying human life. To them, 2,200 military deaths in the entire course of a war in Iraq is unconscionable, but 1.3 million aborted babies in America every year is something to celebrate.

2006-06-27 18:24:36 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-27 18:24:18 · 14 answers · asked by ohan1958 1 in Military

Does a certain group of people have the right to exert their influence, attempting to obliterate the Confederate States portion of American History?

I refer to the fact that over the previous couple of years, a state has been forced to either change their state flag (remove the Confederate flag part), or they would boycott all businesses in that state.

Somewhat recently, a schoolgirl was told to either change/remove the Confederate motif from her clothes, or she would not be allowed to attend school.

The group of people state that the Confederate States flag violates their Constitutional Rights.

Okay, now my question for all readers is this: doesn't this group of people's attempts at obliterating the Confederate States portion of American History violate my Constitutional Rights?

I say it does.

How say other readers of this question?

2006-06-27 18:22:54 · 16 answers · asked by Living In Korea 7 in Other - Politics & Government

This wet foot-dry foot law kills me. It does not matter if you are a rapist, murderer, child molester etc.......... This does happen quite often, I know I live here. They are no better than the illegals, as far as depleting resources. What do you all think?

2006-06-27 18:20:15 · 12 answers · asked by beachdiva954 4 in Immigration

I think In a Free society people should be able to not participate in a society. I think for the general comfort and saftey i think those who choose to live free Should not be allowed into the soceity. But again in America there are the countless bums who live off government handouts and do not add to the econemy.

2006-06-27 18:15:56 · 14 answers · asked by Allibaba 2 in Law & Ethics

If we were to open all borders, what exactly would happen ? A massive move of people and then what ? In the end, wouldn't it all regulate itself and people move where there is a chance of survival ?
Who gives you/us the right to tell people that they cannot come here ? Birth right ? That's life ? History ?

2006-06-27 18:15:45 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration