That the criminal 'justice' system unfairly wieghts charges to immiditely sway a jury, before the trial even begins?
Example:
A drunk gets in his car (drink driving) doesn't stop for the flashing red and blue (resisting arrest), he cannot drive well BECAUSE he is drunk (Reckless driving, reckless endangerment, speeding), He swerves into the oncoming lane or into the lane were a police car is (attempted murder).
and yet the cops attempt to shoot out tires (who knows where THESE stray bullets go?) or use tire spikes (again ensuring that the drunk, who can barely keep his car under control has a vehicle that is uncontrolable).
How about-murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, attempt to do great bodily harm, battery, various weapons charges.
Would not murder, by definiton be the fulfillment of the attempt, and by definition been an attempt to do great bodily harm, and be the worst battery possible?
Seems like stacking the deck, the person MUST be guilty!
What do you think?
2006-06-27
05:53:58
·
18 answers
·
asked by
athorgarak
4
in
Law & Ethics