English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 27 June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2006-06-27 07:05:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1151361018807&call_pageid=1020420665036&col=1112101662670

2006-06-27 07:04:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Of course not, he is not a rapist like Bill Clinton. Or a child-raping midget like Richard Thompson, or a 10-times convicted drug-using gun-totting loser like Robert Downey Jr., or a crashing drunk driver like the two Kennedy's, or a money stashing/bribe taking politician like Jefferson, or a child-killing mom who kills her baby by injecting meth while breast feeding.

2006-06-27 07:02:27 · 25 answers · asked by scorpion 2 in Politics

...Vicente Fox...
Andreas Pastrana...or.... Fidel Castro

2006-06-27 07:00:59 · 48 answers · asked by jennifer h 1 in Other - Politics & Government

And doesn't it seem like few who follow it use "liberal" as a catch-all bad word,and for personal purposes?

2006-06-27 07:00:13 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I think it's because they hate George Bush.. No other reason!!
If Bill Clinton would have done the same thing they'd all be cheering him on!! Liberal hypocrisy at it's best!!

2006-06-27 06:59:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Did you know that a so-called "anchor baby" cannot help their parents get papers until they (the baby) are 18 years old. So many people seem angry about that law, but it is not like BAM! they are citizens now that they had a baby here.

2006-06-27 06:57:39 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Jack(off) Murtha????????????

2006-06-27 06:56:59 · 27 answers · asked by John Scary 5 in Politics

I work in an office suite that has one mens bathroom and one womens bathroom and maybe 20 different offices that share the same bathrooms. The guy who owns this building rarely cleans the bathrooms and when he does, it comes nowhere close to being cleaned properly. I think it's a health hazard. Is there anyone I can call about this or any website that I can report this guy to. I don't want to cause trouble, but i'm tired of having to clean the toilet seat every day, it's just not my job.

2006-06-27 06:56:56 · 13 answers · asked by Sam 3 in Law & Ethics

According to the Church of I Hate Bush the idealogy is think about hating Bush more often than what kind of promises you can make to the American people that would get them to support you.

Heck the Liberals lost control of the Canadian Parilament because they focused on how much they hate America more often than what they could do for Canada causing even Anti-War/Anti-Bush Canadians to vote Conservative knowing full well the Canadian Conservatives are allies with the American Republican Party.

Seriously it seems the Democrats are failing to come up with convincing ideas that would get people to vote for him due to focusing on Hating Bush more often than focusing on what are ya gonna do for America.

2006-06-27 06:55:53 · 19 answers · asked by MrCool1978 6 in Other - Politics & Government

Oh, and learn to speak english liek our ancestors did.

2006-06-27 06:55:10 · 13 answers · asked by Mike Hunt 5 in Immigration

2006-06-27 06:48:06 · 15 answers · asked by Xnibblet 1 in Government

does more name calling?

I personally think more namecalling is done from the left HOWEVER what I find amusing and hypocritical is that those right of left (wherever that is) will call someone names while accusing them of namecalling.

The pot calling the kettle black. :)

Another observation I have is that , maybe I am biased but the best insult anyone right of left can come up w/ is the word 'liberal'.

What say YOU?

I

2006-06-27 06:44:16 · 11 answers · asked by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 in Other - Politics & Government

Who and where can i find him?

2006-06-27 06:43:01 · 11 answers · asked by dro 1 in Immigration

What I mean is: how are trashy Americans who sit around all day on their a**, get welfare and contribute to the US population boom by popping out kids every year any better than undocumented immigrants who hold down two or three jobs, pay taxes and in general contribute to society? Shouldn't we deport the American trash that's draining us and embrace the people who come here to work?

2006-06-27 06:42:21 · 27 answers · asked by lachicadecafe 4 in Immigration

It's nothing personal, I'm just curious what sort of response I get. Because I happen to think I have the solution to this entire mess. The Republican Party isn't concerned about whether you vote Dem or GOP. They are concerned about you voting at all. You see, the more people that vote in this country, the more I believe it hurts the Republican Party. I firmly believe the majority of this country still sides with the Democratic factions and ideals, so of course the GOP will pull out all stops to keep YOU from voting. It certainly makes sense to me. You can easily win an election if voter turnout is poor. Ask Ken Blackwell in Ohio; he has systematically made it next to impossible to register to vote these days. I believe he thinks if he can keep the voting down, he will win. Agree or not?

2006-06-27 06:42:04 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

Should smoking be banned in areas that can affect others (workplace, restaurants, apartment/condos, etc)?

Should you have a right to smoke wherever?

Do you agree or disagree with the following quotes:

"Many fought and died for the freedom of choice in this country..now more freedom is being taken away by the government..it's a choice of one to smoke, they have the right to make that choice..smoking in public places should be prohibited, but also brings up the question on what's next if this is passed!"

"Ban it. NOBODY has the right to pollute someone else's lungs.
Maybe customers have choices about whether or not to go into a restaurant or other public place but every public building has employees. These people deserve the right to breathe unpolluted air. Also, many people bring kids into these public places. Kids have no say in the quality of the air they are exposed to. We need to provide clean air for them."

2006-06-27 06:38:28 · 30 answers · asked by truly 6 in Law & Ethics

it is SELF EVIDENT that when a government becomes tyrannical, the citizenry MUST PULL IT DOWN (my paraphrase of certain ideas spelled out in our founding socuments).

Can a disarmed population pull down a militarized government?
If the citizens allow the ban of weapons, how can it pull down a government, should that need ever arise?

2006-06-27 06:37:37 · 4 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Law & Ethics

Alot of people believe that bush is the worst thing in this country. But doesn't it make sence that instead of tormenting and ridiculing him we should instead support and make sure he knows what the people want. You voted for him American public. Please no bashing of my or other peoples beliefs here.

2006-06-27 06:37:36 · 18 answers · asked by Josh_F 1 in Politics

Just like all their war "Heroes?Who served in Vietnam in the rear
Al Gore John Murtha John Kerry.

2006-06-27 06:36:47 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I don't...but when I ask a question intended to be an insult...I get all these responses from people who ask rude questions all day long wondering where I get the nerve? I learn by example.

2006-06-27 06:33:49 · 14 answers · asked by loubean 5 in Other - Politics & Government

Will you vote against the politicians in November willing to do it - even if they are in your party?

2006-06-27 06:32:43 · 18 answers · asked by netjr 6 in Immigration

Wondering where this stuff comes from? FOX NEWS or ppl make it up as they go along?

Fact: Bush admin was given a database of banking records consisting of all domestic and international transactions.
1. TWISTED FOX NEWS FACT: Bush states he only looked at the international ones. That's like me asking for all records of a certain city and being given all records for the country.

Fact: Because Bush had access to financial transactions that involved American citizens, he was required by law to get court approval to investigate any futher.
2. TWISTED FOX NEWS Fact: because Bush 'claims' he only looked at international records of terrorists, he did not need court approval.

FACT: The news agency that reported this story was in talks with Bush for months prior to publishing it. It was not until they notified Bush 3 days before releasing the story that Bush took it to the courts for approval.
3. TWISTED FOX NEWS Fact: Bush got approval.

LOL, FOX NEWS sure leaves a lot out.

2006-06-27 06:31:35 · 18 answers · asked by BeachBum 7 in Other - Politics & Government

fedest.com, questions and answers